Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2012, 12:07 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,077 posts, read 107,068,415 times
Reputation: 115874

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevdawgg View Post
Lowering taxes and interest rates is the only way to spur the economy.
That's not how Clinton did it, and he created jobs and got the economy back on a solid footing.

Where is Lee Iacocca when you need him? He says he's never needed tax cuts, he's done fine without them, and the country needs the tax revenue more than anyone in his bracket needs tax cuts. Recommended reading: his book, "Where Have All The Leaders Gone?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2012, 12:08 PM
 
25,769 posts, read 16,382,848 times
Reputation: 15947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevdawgg View Post
Many believe that Obama was the cause for the deficit crisis. WRONG. Uneducated or uninformed believe Obama was the cause. Actually, Bush Jr. is to blame. First, with the spending for the wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Then, with all that bailout money to banks and private investors. When Bush Jr. started his presidency, the deficit was at 5 trillion, thanks to Reagan. After Bush Jr. left office, out deficit was at 12 trillion. Then, Obama had to spend money to help clean up the mess that Bush Jr. made.

If you think I'm baloney, please read this:

Obama Didn't Create Today's Budget Deficit Problem. Bush Did. | The New Republic
I thought this was pretty well known. Bush started 3 wars, thus increasing the expenditures of the Government exponentially at the same time giving huge tax breaks to the rich people who financed his coup' into office (Florida criminal election).

Unless we are using "fuzzy Math" as Bush would have said-I think the answer is pretty obvious.

Bill Clinton had the country on a path to be debt free by 2016. That is a FACT. The repukelicans would absolutely hate that. They love the country to be in debt, it gives them justification for cutting programs for the poor and working poor.

Bush did exactly what he was put in office to do. The republicans found the perfect patsy. A moral-less reformed drug addict that would lie to his mother to get ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top