Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:28 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Your disrespect for your ancestors is duly noted.
Perhaps I should be executed, as required by Leviticus.

 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:29 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
If I have refuted certain scientific evidence - then how can you describe it as unrefutable?
You refuted nothing. You simply ignored it.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:30 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
and if I fire a gay for coming out that's the chance he took.
I really, really hope you do that someday.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:30 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,774,059 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
I never had a gay employ.
depending on what job it was would depend if I would fire them
for example if they were around kids I would fire them in a incident.
And if you are in fact an employer in NY state, they could sue you for unlawful discriminatory practices:

"It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice: (a) For an employer or licensing agency, because of an individual's age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, marital status, or domestic violence victim status, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment."
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:33 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
there are many more secular reasons for banning to members of the same sex from marrying then the blue laws.
Please, by all means, impart your wisdom upon us mere mortals.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:34 PM
 
46,946 posts, read 25,979,166 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
A society that allows its population to practice homosexual sex is going to last for very long?
Going by classical examples? Yes. Both the old Greeks and the old Romans boinked anything they could hold down best 2 out of 3, and most would say their societies had a fairly good run.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,003,249 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
That isn't the point. If it's an option, it can happen unless the laws in place prevent it from happening.

Everyone is worried about Mexicans and illegal immigration. Would you have a problem if Mexicans became the majority and banned speaking English in this country, or made Catholicism the required religion to follow
There is no provision in the United States Constitution that prevents any language from being made the official national language. I can read, write, and speak Spanish - so it would not be a difficulty for me.

The First Amendment forbids the establishment of a national religion.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:35 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
A society that allows its population to practice homosexual sex is going to last for very long?
Then we're doomed, for practicing homosexual sex has already been found to be a fundamental constitutional right. See Lawrence v. Texas.

Allowing those already having homosexual sex will not cause it to increase.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:37 PM
 
46,946 posts, read 25,979,166 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
I can't find anything in the Constitution that prevents a city, county, or state from refusing to issue liquor permits. Are you unfamiliar with the term "dry county".
Dry county - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes. And if the local laws change to permit the issuing of liquor licenses, should the community keep on city clerks who refuse to do so for religious reasons? That's kinda what the argument is about.
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:37 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,456 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
but your doing so knowing in the favor of rights is bigoted non the less.

if gays were half way decent people (an oxymoron if there ever was one) they would pay they're salary till they found a new job.
I'm starting to think you're a poe. Your grammar is so atrocious, and at times totally not even understandable that you can't be real.

Nobody is that stupid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top