Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:36 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,957,018 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Without available capital you can demand as much as you wish nothing will happen.
In the past, most small business started by saving money, rather than borrowing from greedy bankers that also want a cut of the action.

Our debt based economy mostly benefits the greedy Wall Street criminals, but fortunately, it is only a matter of time until it crashes, because they don't know when to stop.

In the past, Wall Street accounted for 10% of GDP. Today it accounts for 40% of GDP, backed only by fiat paper, suckering as many people in as they can, extracting the wealth from those that actually work for a living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,199,738 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
And increasing taxes on wealthy people doesn't mean the poor people will directly get that money, this is Washington D.C. we're talking about. Raising taxes on anyone only means the politicians have more money to buy votes with and fund special interest with. It's incredibly naive to think the government is more efficient at distributing capital than business person is. The government has proven that time and time again from paying to run GD shrimp on treadmills to paying for crap like Solyndra and the 8 other failed institutions. Short of government subsidizing solar energy, have you seen anyone willing to buy solar that didn't first start talking about the government write off they can get from it?
How frigging stupid. The poor don't need to get the tax money the uber wealthy SHOULD be paying. Those tax dollars should be used to pay down the public debt the uber wealthy have rung up with their repeated raids on the fed and the treasury. Bailouts, pension fund defaults, savings and loan defaults, unfunded oil wars, TARP. Much of the public debt was run up by the industrial military complex and the allies. It is time THEY start clearing that huge debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:44 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,201,427 times
Reputation: 3411
[quote=EinsteinsGhost;24363061]Would you hire people to produce goods and services without worrying about demand? I won't.

Compared to what?

Hence my point. You don't go hiring people because you have the money to. You go hire people when you see business opportunity, a demand for your goods/services.[/quote]


That's exactly it--demand CREATES business opportunity. Without demand, there is no business.

As far as access to capital goes, I've only known of a couple of businesses in my life that used venture capital. Some small businesses start out with a small personal investment and they bootstrap it--they reinvest profits until they get to the point where they have to have a line of credit, etc. and then they go to a bank. Some start with the bank, or they self finance from the start. I'm a part of three businesses--my husband is a partner in one, I'm the owner of a small business myself, and I'm also part owner in my family's farming operation. We employ about 60 people between the three of them, plus family. That's job creation--not giving some guy a break on his personal income taxes when those funds don't even go back into the business to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:46 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,957,018 times
Reputation: 3070
Your absolutely correct. Without any money in the middle class, we are going to continue to spiral downward.

Wages have been stagnating for the past 30 years for the middle and lower classes. In order to compensate for that decline, the criminal class made credit cheap and easily available, and housing more available for people to live off the equity.

That has all come to and end. Credit Card usage is at an all time low because American's are wising up and only spending what they have.


Quote:
Visa, MasterCard could be hurt by lower card usage

Americans have reached for their credit cards less often this year. That's bad news for Visa and MasterCard, which report their quarterly earnings Wednesday.

Read more: Visa, MasterCard could be hurt by lower card usage - Wilkes-Barre, news, sports, obituaries, and classifieds for Luzerne County and Scranton | The Times Leader, Wilkes-Barre, Scranton PA - www.timesleader.com
The American consumer is all tapped out and the criminal class can't squeeze blood from a turnip.

The criminal class are not done yet though, and are now looking at cutting as many things as possible to continue the ponzi scheme for themselves.
They have quite the dilemma though, because they cannot cut welfare that they used to subsidize cheap labor.
That would chase all the cheap labor away, and fields would like fallow or rot until wages go up to meet what American's are willing to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Konraden View Post
It's circular, but the point-of-failure in this recession isn't with decreased capital, but with decrease demand. If you don't have enough demand, you don't start enforcing economic policies which are designed to aid in raising capital. Increased capital doesn't create or increase demand!

We have a fundamental demand crisis in the United States as a direct result of income inequality. Too many people are making too little money. Cutting taxes for the wealthy, for the "job creators," doesn't create jobs. Raising them will.

Like this TED speaker notes, he can't buy enough cars, enough pairs of pants as a millionaire, to replace the pant-buying and car-buying power of millions of middle-class Americans. Raising his taxes benefits both the middle-class and the top-class more than cutting taxes will, because in the end, an increased demand means money for the top.

Cutting taxes for the top is shortsighted and selfish. Cut taxes now might save them a few hundred thousand dollars (on the high end) at the expense of millions of potential profit down the road. An "I got mine" attitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:52 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Your absolutely correct. Without any money in the middle class, we are going to continue to spiral downward.

Wages have been stagnating for the past 30 years for the middle and lower classes. In order to compensate for that decline, the criminal class made credit cheap and easily available, and housing more available for people to live off the equity.

That has all come to and end. Credit Card usage is at an all time low because American's are wising up and only spending what they have.




The American consumer is all tapped out and the criminal class can't squeeze blood from a turnip.
Yes, because it's the drug suppliers fault the drug users are addicted. They kidnapped those addicts and got them addicted then sent them out to rob and steal to keep their habits up.

Or, letter Q, people make choices and if you made a choice to leverage yourself to the hilt it's no one else's fault but your own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:56 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,201,427 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
So why use heavy equipment on constructing roads?

Imagine how many people a bull dozer replaces?
What are you talking about? Mechanization is part of life. The trick is to have a better trained and educated work force and higher tech industries to replace those low skill jobs replaced by machines. That doesn't just mean more college grads--its means more people with tech and trade school skills. It also means this country doing whatever it can to build a manufacturing base here at home vs. basically paying companies through tax loopholes and pork, and then smiling and waving "bye bye" while they hire off shore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:59 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,201,427 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
And increasing taxes on wealthy people doesn't mean the poor people will directly get that money, this is Washington D.C. we're talking about. Raising taxes on anyone only means the politicians have more money to buy votes with and fund special interest with. It's incredibly naive to think the government is more efficient at distributing capital than business person is. The government has proven that time and time again from paying to run GD shrimp on treadmills to paying for crap like Solyndra and the 8 other failed institutions. Short of government subsidizing solar energy, have you seen anyone willing to buy solar that didn't first start talking about the government write off they can get from it?
How about paying on the debt and reinvesting in trying to get some kind of manufacturing base back in this country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:13 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
How about paying on the debt and reinvesting in trying to get some kind of manufacturing base back in this country?
Paying on the debt? You'd need twice as many rich people as there are now and then you'd need to tax them at 100% rates to break even on the yearly budget.

Then of course you'll have the shortfalls of SS and Medicare and that will require another whole set of rich people equal to the amount now to keep them going temporarily for a few more decades.

As far as manufacturing goes, you folks are incredibly dense or you love to practice self-delusion. What part of $35/hr U.S. wages can't compete with $2.15/hr wages is so hard to comprehend?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:26 PM
 
3,614 posts, read 3,501,246 times
Reputation: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Paying on the debt? You'd need twice as many rich people as there are now and then you'd need to tax them at 100% rates to break even on the yearly budget.

Then of course you'll have the shortfalls of SS and Medicare and that will require another whole set of rich people equal to the amount now to keep them going temporarily for a few more decades.
Patently false. The top 1% earn 35% of all income in the United States.

The total income in the United States is 13.3 trillion.

The National Debt is 16 trillion (high-estimate).

The U.S. Spending, however, is 3 trillion.

13.3 trillion * 35% = 4.6 trillion.

You only need 66% of personal income of the top 1% to pay the entire budget.

And, let us not forget, that doesn't include the billions that are made through non-income which isn't included with the taxes there.

So patently false.

Quote:
As far as manufacturing goes, you folks are incredibly dense or you love to practice self-delusion. What part of $35/hr U.S. wages can't compete with $2.15/hr wages is so hard to comprehend?
And yet Japan has no problem making their cars here...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2012, 12:41 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konraden View Post
That's not evidence, that's anecdote.
it absolutely is evidence, i have ran the numbers at the business level myself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Oh good grief. No one, and I mean no one, is talking about raising corporate taxes--they're talking about raising personal income taxes, and lowering corporate taxes. That's a heck of a note--the only people proposing a solidly conservative plan are the democrats, and that's why I'm about as frustrated as I've ever been with the republican party. If your friend who rents out houses isn't incorporated then he needs a better bookkeeper/accountant.
it doesnt matter if he is incorporated or not. when his costs go up, so do rents. it is that simple. the only advantage for him to incorporate is that it would limit his liability should anything untoward happen to his tenants. and yes i have tried to get him to incorporate but he refuses. and by the way, i dont do his books for him, it avoids issues between us as friends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top