Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2012, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Murika
2,526 posts, read 3,005,230 times
Reputation: 1929

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
The problem is that there are a lot of tech-illiterate parents who have no idea how to do these things. For example, I use OpenDNS for filtering at my house, but it requires you to change your router settings. That's above a lot of, perhaps most parents' heads.
I have no doubt about that. Still, it is the responsibility of each person to educated themselves if they are unhappy with this issue. Solutions are available and it should certainly not be the responsibility of others to shoulder the burden when other are incapable of finding a personal solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
As for what is pornographic or not, there are various databases compiled of sites that visitors overwhelmingly considered "pornographic". ("Pornography", "nudity", etc. are blocking categories on the OpenDNS toolbox). Perhaps ISP's could contract through companies like OpenDNS (no promotion intended). Ideally, they would enable filtering by default to prevent children whose parents are negligent in this regard as well as adults who are not too into these sites but sometimes visit them, as pornography presents a great harm to society.
Indeed. Still, people's sensitivities vary widely and it is impossible to have a solution that fits all needs. A friend of mine from Germany was sitting in front of Whole Foods using his computer to catch up on news back home. He was unable to access a major news magazine (Stern) because it had been put on Whole Food's database as inappropriate. It's about as offensive as Time...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2012, 01:38 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
So much for going to the library to look at porn..............

The Brooklyn man stabbed in the chest at a library Tuesday insists he was simply searching for a job — not surfing skin sites.
Ransom Alton, 52, spoke from his East New York home less than a day after Ralph Neptune, 46, allegedly knifed him on the second floor of the Brooklyn Heights Branch of the Brooklyn Public Library.
Neptune sprang into action after seeing what he believed was a porn video on Alton’s screen, police sources said.
“He stabbed me in the chest,” Alton said. “I had just sat down and gone online — it happened so fast.”
“He said something about somebody messing with his girlfriend or wife,” Alton continued. “(Then) he attacked me.”

Read more: Guy stabbed in library says he wasn't watching porn - NY Daily News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2012, 01:50 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post

I can easily re-create the block page I made for work - which includes a button that says "Unblock Me" to where an email is sent to the SysAdmins with the URL of a page that is being requested for unblocking. From there, I can check out the page on my own and decide whether or not to unblock it.
White listing is always easier than black listing and it's 100% effective. I know if I had a child especially a very young one that's the way I would go about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2012, 01:50 PM
Sco
 
4,259 posts, read 4,919,645 times
Reputation: 3373
Why should everyone be punished just because some parents lack the ability to properly raise their own children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2012, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,171,483 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
White listing is always easier than black listing and it's 100% effective. I know if I had a child especially a very young one that's the way I would go about it.
At her current age (5), pure whitelisting would be easier - but I monitor everything directly as it is... so it's pointless. As she gets older, she's going to need access to more and more sites (especially for doing research for school). In the long run, it's easier and more effective for me to run with a blacklist and whitelist combination and maintain it. Squid is pretty handy for this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2012, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,216,280 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Why does everything in your world revolve around Beck and politics?

You have my sympathy...
Not to worry, I haven't seen or heard from Beck since he left Fox. Was just a comparison to porn.

Feel better ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2012, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,127,435 times
Reputation: 6913
Quote:
Originally Posted by vamos View Post
I have no doubt about that. Still, it is the responsibility of each person to educated themselves if they are unhappy with this issue. Solutions are available and it should certainly not be the responsibility of others to shoulder the burden when other are incapable of finding a personal solution.



Indeed. Still, people's sensitivities vary widely and it is impossible to have a solution that fits all needs. A friend of mine from Germany was sitting in front of Whole Foods using his computer to catch up on news back home. He was unable to access a major news magazine (Stern) because it had been put on Whole Food's database as inappropriate. It's about as offensive as Time...
Note that this wouldn't mean the internet would be censored for EVERYBODY - rather each subscriber would have the choice whether or not to censor out pornographic (and other objectionable; e.g. drug use, proxy filters, etc.) websites. If this was offered at no charge, it would probably not raise ISP fees by more than $1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top