Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because we don't know anything about the mothers. We know enough about the father to know he is a pathetic loser. We know enough about the situation to know that the mothers most likely are as well, but we do not know anything about them specifically so we can only speculate.
Because we don't know anything about the mothers. We know enough about the father to know he is a pathetic loser. We know enough about the situation to know that the mothers most likely are as well, but we do not know anything about them specifically so we can only speculate.
You've already admitted that you didn't know if the father was a con artist; therefore, you have demonstrated that you do not have adequate information about the father to form an opinion of him. However, with equally inadequate knowledge, you've given an out for the women.
My opinion is that you're rationalizing your sexist beliefs; you didn't realize that you're a sexist and now, rather than admit it, you're straining to fight it.
You've already admitted that you didn't know if the father was a con artist; therefore, you have demonstrated that you do not have adequate information about the father to form an opinion of him. However, with equally inadequate knowledge, you've given an out for the women.
My opinion is that you're rationalizing your sexist beliefs; you didn't realize that you're a sexist and now, rather than admit it, you're straining to fight it.
You bible loving southerners need to be loaded up with some contraceptives or at least sterilized no offense. Having to many kids like this is gonna hamper the welfare system. Seriously some states need to cap welfare benefits and remove kids from their parents and put them in foster homes.
Thing is these 'Welfare mothers" were looking to get pregnant. If not him then someone else. A very sad ploy to get more money. Welfare should cap benefits at 4 kids.
4? Really?
I think that if you can't feed them, don't breed them.
This opens an entirely new can of worms because there's a segment of society against women having the right to use birth control, who hate women exercising their right to choose (probably not the case here) and want them to breed without providing them with any sort of medical, food, educational or shelter.
Ummmm, a woman does not/can not get pregnant without sperm.
It's a medical fact.
Seriously.
I sometimes wonder if women have a greater natural responsibility. They're evolved to be selective in mating and to carry the burden, so I don't know; shouldn't they assume a little more responsibility for the result of sex?
I sometimes wonder if women have a greater natural responsibility. They're evolved to be selective in mating and to carry the burden, so I don't know; shouldn't they assume a little more responsibility for the result of sex?
Until men stay out of trying to legislate a woman's rights, they have nothing to say.
This guy couldn't say no?
Really, if men have no self-control, they all need to be sterilized.
If a man doesn't want the possibility of having kids, either don't have sex, get a vasectomy or ensure birth control is used (by yourself).
It's so easy to blame women for everything.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...cans-Took-Over
“To date, legislators have introduced 916 measures related to reproductive health and rights in the 49 legislatures that have convened their regular sessions.”
Don't like this link, there are hundreds more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.