Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-16-2012, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
I posted the link. Go up.
I was suggesting he hitchike a ride from those that are buying the car insurance and maintaining their vehicles. What would happen to all the auto repair shops, Napa Auto Parts stores et al, tire shops, gas stations, state registration fees, insurance companies, revenue from traffic stops and CHP. We have a huge infrastructure in place for the cars, with a lot of jobs depending upon us driving. It's a voluntary system, that's why we have taxi's, rental cars, buses. You can order to have items delivered. Everybody can do their thing.

With these quaint urban villages, haven't you wondered what kind of jobs they will have in the business zone? Ice cream shops, healthfood stores, what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2012, 10:12 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,932,453 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
I was suggesting he hitchike a ride from those that are buying the car insurance and maintaining their vehicles. What would happen to all the auto repair shops, Napa Auto Parts stores et al, tire shops, gas stations, state registration fees, insurance companies, revenue from traffic stops and CHP. We have a huge infrastructure in place for the cars, with a lot of jobs depending upon us driving. It's a voluntary system, that's why we have taxi's, rental cars, buses. You can order to have items delivered. Everybody can do their thing.

With these quaint urban villages, haven't you wondered what kind of jobs they will have in the business zone? Ice cream shops, healthfood stores, what?
I updated my post, as it dawned on me what you meant. We have tech on our side. The current model for the auto industry has actually held back technology due to the financial interests. You can have many different types of jobs.

As far as manufacturing well that is a different animal, but tech is also changing that drastically. Things change. It is natural, but just like people fearing "automation" computers created tons of jobs.
I do believe in choice. One size doesn't fit all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2012, 10:24 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,853,319 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Is there a chance you could provide a link to this map? It sounds too much like something you may have picked up at ICLEI since you are so taken in by what they want, like the map that Agenda 21 has that shows the rest of the country as new animal kingdom. Is that what you are showing us? Have you people determined where your food will come from?

This map shows everything in just what it proposes but where does the food come from. Those of us in the supposedly uninhabited areas would soon be gone and then what would be used for the Soiylent Green type of food.

A link is very necessary for us to accept your map. Link, link, link.
The Rural areas that are still left , the Northeastern cities encourage small private farmers to sell in the cities...its preferred over large corporations..which often ignores the inner cities. Most of the Midwest will remain untouched and still be used for Farming... Those maps have very little to do with A21...its just populated regions....

Megaregions - America 2050
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2012, 11:44 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
I updated my post, as it dawned on me what you meant. We have tech on our side. The current model for the auto industry has actually held back technology due to the financial interests. You can have many different types of jobs.

As far as manufacturing well that is a different animal, but tech is also changing that drastically. Things change. It is natural, but just like people fearing "automation" computers created tons of jobs.
I do believe in choice. One size doesn't fit all.
So you expect the people living in these urban communites will work on computers? I don't think I'm following you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 01:01 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,932,453 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
So you expect the people living in these urban communites will work on computers? I don't think I'm following you.
Sure. Well computers are just part of tech. I am saying tech allows many options in many areas. A "village" model doesn't mean you can't have many diff types of svcs or products. Not unless you get into strange zoning, but that is a different issue. The design issues are very different from the govt/ admin side of it.

The site you mentioned. ic.org has tons of grass roots communities that are very creative and innovative. Really interesting. Now that doesn't mean that everything about any of these grps is perfect.

Here is one that is very successful. Been around for awhile. They got the nature thing, sustainability, self-sufficiency and tech. All in "cottage" industry. I am not recommending this as a model of how things should be. Just showing real people going out and solving problems. Many "communities" haven't been successful due to funding mostly. Another one on there has taken care of the needs of over 100 people with a good quality of life for as little as 10,000 per person a yr. Another one has a free book that shows a "village" model that has a corporate financial model, self sustaining, cashless with small cash funding.

Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage | Building Sustainable Community

Tax money is different. That should involve tax payers. Just like with public schools. Things get muddied cause it's everybody's money. One of the reasons I am not a fan of big govt. I think it is important not to confuse the issues; environmental, designs, funding, govt, zoning etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 01:27 AM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,285,459 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
I am against the UN entirely. I hate the idea of social engineering that liberals and the UN are forcing on us....

that being said, I have never understood the need for that formal living room in the front of big houses.

the space is better off being put in other areas like the actual living room where everyone goes.

My house was built 50+ years ago and it has a formal living room and formal dining room. Neither is used more than 3-4 times a year. I talked to a contractor about tearing the wall down between the formals and the den, but since it's a load-bearing wall it would be tricky and pricey, so I decided against it. If that wall wasn't load-bearing it'd be gone by now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 01:31 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,932,453 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
My house was built 50+ years ago and it has a formal living room and formal dining room. Neither is used more than 3-4 times a year. I talked to a contractor about tearing the wall down between the formals and the den, but since it's a load-bearing wall it would be tricky and pricey, so I decided against it. If that wall wasn't load-bearing it'd be gone by now.
Maybe you can cut a "window" hole to open it up. Certainly can use mirrors, but those solutions don't really let you use the space better just open it up "cosmetically". Yeah that design is limited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:37 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,853,319 times
Reputation: 4581
1990 Population : 43 Million
2000 Population : 49 Million
2010 Population : 53 Million
2025 Population : 58.1 Million
2050 Population : 75.8 Million[/color]


2010 Transit Daily Usage : 20.4 Million
2025 Transit Daily Usage : 35 Million
2050 Transit Daily Usage : 50 Million



1990



2000



2010



2020



2030



2040

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:58 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
Sure. Well computers are just part of tech. I am saying tech allows many options in many areas. A "village" model doesn't mean you can't have many diff types of svcs or products. Not unless you get into strange zoning, but that is a different issue. The design issues are very different from the govt/ admin side of it.

The site you mentioned. ic.org has tons of grass roots communities that are very creative and innovative. Really interesting. Now that doesn't mean that everything about any of these grps is perfect.

Here is one that is very successful. Been around for awhile. They got the nature thing, sustainability, self-sufficiency and tech. All in "cottage" industry. I am not recommending this as a model of how things should be. Just showing real people going out and solving problems. Many "communities" haven't been successful due to funding mostly. Another one on there has taken care of the needs of over 100 people with a good quality of life for as little as 10,000 per person a yr. Another one has a free book that shows a "village" model that has a corporate financial model, self sustaining, cashless with small cash funding.

Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage | Building Sustainable Community

Tax money is different. That should involve tax payers. Just like with public schools. Things get muddied cause it's everybody's money. One of the reasons I am not a fan of big govt. I think it is important not to confuse the issues; environmental, designs, funding, govt, zoning etc...
You said they are real people going out and solving problems, what problems are they solving?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 03:01 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
1990 Population : 43 Million
2000 Population : 49 Million
2010 Population : 53 Million
2025 Population : 58.1 Million
2050 Population : 75.8 Million[/color]

2010 Transit Daily Usage : 20.4 Million
2025 Transit Daily Usage : 35 Million
2050 Transit Daily Usage : 50 Million


1990



2000



2010



2020



2030



2040
yeah, so, what's your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top