Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Young adults under the age of 26, who are currently on their parent’s health insurance plan, can expect cooperation from at least one Republican senator if the Supreme Court overturns the entire Affordable Care Act.
“I believe that’s one of the things that the Congress would surely reinstate,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, of Missouri, in an interview with Missouri radio station KTRS, which was posted to the senator’s YouTube page last Thursday and highlighted today by the liberal website Talking Points Memo.
Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., made some noise among conservatives when he expressed his support for preserving parts of the health care law.
"Children" under age 26 staying on their parents health insurance is my single worst thing I hate about Obamacare. I now consider Blunt a RINO and hope he get's primaried next election. He is everything that's wrong with Republicans.
"Children" under age 26 staying on their parents health insurance is my single worst thing I hate about Obamacare. I now consider Blunt a RINO and hope he get's primaried next election. He is everything that's wrong with Republicans.
Just curious as to why this is the most offensive part to you. It's not like they are being covered for free.
there are things to like in the obamacare law, the problem is the tons of junk in the bill, increased taxes, many more regulations, as well as the federal mandate to buy a product that kills the law for me.
there are things to like in the obamacare law, the problem is the tons of junk in the bill, increased taxes, many more regulations, as well as the federal mandate to buy a product that kills the law for me.
Something like this is bound to need quite a Few shakedown cruises to get the bugs out..
there are things to like in the obamacare law, the problem is the tons of junk in the bill, increased taxes, many more regulations, as well as the federal mandate to buy a product that kills the law for me.
Ahh, without the mandate the things you like in the bill don't make sense, you know that right? It's like saying you want someone to bake apple pie without any pie crust.
Feel free to outline the number of viable alternatives that were proposed. I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with hero.
There's a reason why the Republicans proposed this same idea in the 90's.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
