Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2012, 09:52 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,932,494 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Read my post to you and you can see plenty of evidence of Obama being a member of the Party. Yep, it is right there. I can't seem to make that link work but I just brought you the whole thing so you could see it.
No, there is no evidence in your links of Obama being a member of the New Party. Perhaps you need to check out a dictionary for the meaning of "evidence".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2012, 10:35 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,252 posts, read 108,199,089 times
Reputation: 116244
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
You are one of the very best twist and spinners and I guess you have determined that you are the winner with your twist and spin. By golly there is nothing there but the record of that meeting of the DSA.
Well you would know all about twist and spin. None of the articles posted here say what the posters claim they say. One even says the opposite. Read carefully, put your thinking cap on if you have one. Take off the mud-colored glasses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,806,762 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
Well you would know all about twist and spin. None of the articles posted here say what the posters claim they say. One even says the opposite. Read carefully, put your thinking cap on if you have one. Take off the mud-colored glasses.
All of this is just rhetoric. Who cares what Obama is aligned with, unless of course you want the country (and Constitution) back. You only need look at Obama's dismal record to see he IS HIS OWN THIRD PARTY.

You only need a little hindsight to see this constitutional lawyer, who surrendered his license to avoid being disbarred (Michelle as well), hates the Constitution. If there's mud on anyones glasses, it would be those blinded by his clever oration, believing his words while ignoring his actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 01:07 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,138,133 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Read my post to you and you can see plenty of evidence of Obama being a member of the Party. Yep, it is right there. I can't seem to make that link work but I just brought you the whole thing so you could see it.

In other words, there is no evidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,102,670 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I knew that the Dude would be in with his kind of deflection since he is such a good reader and nothing says specifically that Obama was a member.
There is no deflection. I have directly pointed out that you have failed to present any evidence that Obama was a member.

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
The rest might have been but he couldn't have been.
It's not a question of "could be." It's a question of whether or not there is evidence than anybody on that list "was."

There is none.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:03 PM
 
30,118 posts, read 18,723,934 times
Reputation: 20960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre.Linoge View Post
Obama’s Third-Party History - Stanley Kurtz - National Review Online

Interesting; I hadn't heard of the New Party before.
Yep

This was widely know in Illinois, even before the election. Obama is a died in the wool commy who has tried very hard to hide his past. So far, it has worked very well, given the complicency of an obtunded and mesmermized media.

It is laughable and shocking at the same time, but reinforces the lunacy of liberalism in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:23 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,511,838 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
That's nice.

You do understand that organizations ENDORSE candidates that don't belong to their organizations, right?
I'll remember that when someone like Romney has the KKK endorse him and when you guys flip your lid when he speaks to avowed anarchist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,102,670 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Obama is a died in the wool commy who has tried very hard to hide his past.
Died in the wool.



Dyed in the wool.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2012, 02:15 PM
 
93 posts, read 60,052 times
Reputation: 37
Quote:
In the ongoing discussion of Barack Obama's involvement with Chicago's extremist "New Party," online literature from the Party likely reveals that the young state senator not only was a member but had to commit financially to membership.

'New Party' Literature Suggests Obama Paid Dues to Join
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,229,171 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by noexcuseforignorance View Post
Great read? Come up with some opinions of your own instead of pasting those of others.

You pay into social security don't you? You're a socialist. Everyone on this forum makes use of communal sidewalks and roads...socialism. Those on Social Security? Big time socialists. I mean George W Bush tried passing a new version of Social Security. He's thus a socialist. Pretty much every Senator and member of the House protects SS. They're all socialists.

I mean if socialism pisses you off that much, go running down the street pointing your finger at everyone.
My house is on a corner lot. So, are you saying that as I have a sidewalk in the front of my house then that my use of that area makes me a socialist? While my side yard has no sidewalk, would that make me a bum? an independent? a free marketer? what? If I use that space for a garden would it make me a capitalist? Even if the gas company retains access right of way for a gas pipeline?

As most citizens who 'succumb' to the imposition of social security don't have the resources to resist wouldn't they really be victims of a socialist government, rather than socialists themselves? And what about those citizens who attempt to change the socialist nature of that government? Even though they still pay those SS taxes, are they still socialists?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top