Elizabeth Warren's tomahawk to go to Smithsonian right next too GOP War on Women

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

That is true but I had to answer Historian Dude with something he couldn't easily kick aside.

To kick something aside it must first actually be in your way.

I'm still waiting for something to kick.

[tluv00]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

You never call me consternation, Roy. You should know that by now. As in this case, what you write almost never turns out to be true, so by now that's the safe operating assumption going in to any of your threads.

I note that neither of your links does anything to show that your post was true (well, to be fair, one of them was simply broken). So, I'm still waiting for that link.

Roys MO

1) Post with false, misleading comments and words
2) Get called out
3) Say "Did you actually read the article?"
4) Post new links that don't back up his actual false claims (in this example "stripped")
5) Make excuses about not actually being able to back up his words
6) Vanish (that should be coming soon) to another misleading thread full of false outrage.

We get it ROB. She lied. They all do. Show me a politician who has not lied and I will show you one who has never been elected.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Speleothem

She can't be "stripped" of what she never had.
The Cherokees, who keep track of such things,
contend that no evidence exists of her claim.

Perhaps you can provide the link that Roy cannot to justify this claim?

And by "The Cherokees" it is my hope you mean the actual official tribe, as opposed to the alleged "150" Cherokees (less than 5 hundredths of one percent of the nation) that protested a few weeks ago.

[tluv00]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

That is true but I had to answer Historian Dude with something he couldn't easily kick aside.

Like facts or the truth?