Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2012, 06:43 PM
 
2,548 posts, read 2,164,379 times
Reputation: 729

Advertisements

I notice that when people are debating an issue it's common for someone to focus on the person(s) debating while ignoring the actual issue. It doesn't matter what the issue is, it almost always becomes about the people debating and less about the actual issue. I see it happening in real life and on the internet. It's become so common many of use get sucked into it, yours truly included. Occupy Wall Street became more about the hygiene and moral character of the occupiers and less about Wall Street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2012, 06:45 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,740,274 times
Reputation: 20852
Because human being are the ones engaging in the debates. It is human nature to resort to ad homs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2012, 06:47 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,422 posts, read 60,608,674 times
Reputation: 61036
Because you have some regular posters who don't know anything else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2012, 11:15 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
When one is losing a debate they go to personal attacks. They have nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2012, 11:31 PM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
It's called ad-hominem. When you try to invalidate somebodies argument based on something unrelated.

And everybody on here and in real life does it... Some more (a lot) than others. It happens because everybody is "bigoted" in some regard when it comes to social issues. And social issues are nothing but people debating their preferences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2012, 12:07 AM
 
Location: The Land Mass Between NOLA and Mobile, AL
1,796 posts, read 1,662,396 times
Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frugality View Post
I notice that when people are debating an issue it's common for someone to focus on the person(s) debating while ignoring the actual issue. It doesn't matter what the issue is, it almost always becomes about the people debating and less about the actual issue. I see it happening in real life and on the internet. It's become so common many of use get sucked into it, yours truly included. Occupy Wall Street became more about the hygiene and moral character of the occupiers and less about Wall Street.
Even though it's really tempting to go ad hominem (attack to the person), especially when someone is being unreasonable, it's really not productive and is an argumentative fallacy that's related to a red herring. As you mention, it also involves stasis shifting or shifting the topic. Full disclosure: I've been guilty of it myself.

That said, just because it is tempting and might give us a temporary sense of one-up-personship, I think we should try to avoid it, especially online where it's easy to be insulting. Along with other fallacies of argument, it's really poisonous to democratic deliberation. I'm not saying that places like C-D should be filled with kumbaya moments, but rather that there would be more light and less heat generated if people could focus on the issues at hand.

The example of OWS is a good one--demonizing the protestors prevented people from thinking about the things that were being protested against.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2012, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,568,492 times
Reputation: 4262
People that do that are losers and intellectual midgets. They can't address the topic, so they shift the focus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2012, 12:49 AM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,337,514 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
People that do that are losers and intellectual midgets. They can't address the topic, so they shift the focus.
That is often true, yet sometimes the OP itself is only a thinly veiled ad hominem. Those are the ones that puzzle me. They also make me grateful for alert mods.

Personally, I try not to descend to personal screeds like Interbred or whatever his name is, above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2012, 01:20 AM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,635,477 times
Reputation: 16395
I think when you see the same poster(s) posting the same misinformation over and over and over again as 'fact', even when it's been debunked multiple times you can get frustrated and lash out a bit.

I've seen the same website, the same information usually by the same posters in different threads and it is continually proven false so they'll just wait until another thread pops up and post it again.

It gets old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2012, 04:38 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by diva360 View Post

The example of OWS is a good one--demonizing the protestors prevented people from thinking about the things that were being protested against.
It's a good example of ad-hominem. But it was justifiably attacked because, as witnessed, many of those protesters had no idea what they were protesting against.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top