Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,564 posts, read 12,820,368 times
Reputation: 9400

Advertisements

So this is supposed to be some ground breaking brilliant statement? Why did Obama not put it simply instead of attempting to be fancy?







Eg- People can't go around telling other people what to do...or maybe quote from a kids' show and say "You're not the boss of me"


This photo and the quote presented as being profound- is the perfect example of empty rhetorical jabber. Next time he says something - take some time to think about it and you will notice that most of the time he says nothing- Just because you SOUND like you are relevant does not make it a fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Bach View Post
This photo and the quote presented as being profound- is the perfect example of empty rhetorical jabber.
Your argument is empty rhetoric, with the intention to downplay the message. There is nothing empty about a message that conveys that, personal freedoms are personal, not to be directed and governed by a collective: You choose for self. How is that "empty"?

This quote reminds me of another, which I have mentioned a few times:
"A lot of so-called conservatives don't know what the word means. They think I've turned liberal because I believe a woman has a right to an abortion. That's a decision that's up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the Religious Right."
- Barry Goldwater, 1994


Nothing empty about that either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,783,759 times
Reputation: 24863
According to the RWNJ's Mr. Goldwater was an ignorant leftist that did not understand the Will of God. God made women to be the slaves of men and that is that. Men wrote that a couple of thousand years ago.

Needless to say this freedom loving conservative posing as a Communist Fascist Autocratic Rebel does not believe any of that BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 12:47 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,511,041 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Nonsense.
BC CAN, not will, be a factor in other medical diseases; it's also a lie that BC is solely to prevent pregnancy.
But you know the truth; you just don't like it.
Saying a lie over and over again will never make it the truth.

I took bc even after my tubal ligation because I would be unable to leave my bed with cramps.
Many women use it for more than bc.

Been adopting any unwanted babies lately?
The Church has no problem with taking BC for medical conditions. That is not the issue here.

I tried to adopt but I aged out. Have you tried to adopt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
The Church has no problem with taking BC for medical conditions. That is not the issue here.

I tried to adopt but I aged out. Have you tried to adopt?
Yes, they do. They purposely didn't give their private sector employees access to birth control for those medical reasons. Thats part of the reason it was made mandatory for health insurance companies to cover the cost of the birth control. The church isn't paying for anything they don't want, but what they were already paying for was expanded to cover other things.

On a personal note, You've flopped more in this thread then a fish out of water. Just on this point alone, you first said the ONLY reason to take oral contraception was to avoid pregnancy, and now you're saying that the church has no problem with their employees taking contraception for medical conditions which you didn't acknowledge existed.

Boggles the mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 01:03 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,511,041 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Yes, they do. They purposely didn't give their private sector employees access to birth control for those medical reasons. Thats part of the reason it was made mandatory for health insurance companies to cover the cost of the birth control. The church isn't paying for anything they don't want, but what they were already paying for was expanded to cover other things.

On a personal note, You've flopped more in this thread then a fish out of water. Just on this point alone, you first said the ONLY reason to take oral contraception was to avoid pregnancy, and now you're saying that the church has no problem with their employees taking contraception for medical conditions which you didn't acknowledge existed.

Boggles the mind.
Look it up---it's the truth. Medical conditions, other than preventing pregnancy, is no problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
The Church has no problem with taking BC for medical conditions. That is not the issue here.

I tried to adopt but I aged out. Have you tried to adopt?
Nice backtracking.
It's none of the church's business why people take BC.
Are they, the richest organization in the world, paying for these unwanted babies?
The church needs to lose it's tax status and get in touch with the modern world.
You know, like put up or shut up.
Prove there's a god thingie, or close down.

I don't like kids, hence my sterilization.
I'm not running around trying to force women to breed.
You are.

The church needs to mind its own business and stay out of mine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Look it up---it's the truth. Medical conditions, other than preventing pregnancy, is no problem.
That's not what you said.
I'm not looking it up.
You said that the only reason women take BC is to avoid pregnancy.
You chose to throw in the cancer scare, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:11 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,511,041 times
Reputation: 7472
Default Here---it's not very hard when you know how.

Viagra for Her

I found it in about 10 seconds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 10:14 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,511,041 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Nice backtracking.
It's none of the church's business why people take BC.
Are they, the richest organization in the world, paying for these unwanted babies?
The church needs to lose it's tax status and get in touch with the modern world.
You know, like put up or shut up.
Prove there's a god thingie, or close down.

I don't like kids, hence my sterilization.
I'm not running around trying to force women to breed.
You are.

The church needs to mind its own business and stay out of mine.

The church would love nothing better than to stay out of your business. When someone buys your insurance they get in your business. Go elsewhere for insurance or be satisfied with what they can provide. That is how it works at each business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by CK78 View Post
One of the main problems of the modern age is people ascribe "rights" for themselves that do not exist. There is NO "RIGHT" to "religious freedom". It does not exist!
Yes it does, and not just promoted in the US Constitution but in every person's life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top