Romney Punts on immigration.

[texdav]

Originally Posted by RegalSin

It was the most hallarious thing. Romney is automatically going to be President, but the moment the wording about immigration, he fumbles. Honestly if an immigrant is able to go in the military and serve his nation, then I would allow him. However if an immigrant is working a Masters, or Phd. job and is getting
paid in gold bars, then the answer is no. The criminal thing can be iffi, because some people are in jail because of their spouses.

What makes you say he funmbled. He;Bush;mcCain;even Obama said they were for permanent immagration reforms.Obama even told hispanic i national speeches that he cxould not just make Dream act so as that would be illegal under laws. Now he has punted;not Romney or any one else.Romney affirmed his prior stance on seeking immagration reform.I didn't see nay nominee avdocating what Obam has done even when he and Hillary answered the question on immigationl policy. Romney has confrimed he is for reform under law, What I see is Obama's decreee actaully endangering any reform that would have to be a compromise to pass.Obama punted rerom of immigration laws out of the realm but he is getting famous on punting any compromise which is what the art of poltics is about.

[Taratova]

Originally Posted by chicagonut

Brilliant? How was throwing the millions of American unemployed (many whom are his fellow blacks) under the bus by adding 800,000 new workers to our workforce competing with them for jobs a brilliant move?

Why can't the educated go back to Mexico and help their own country create jobs.. help the Mexicans stay there and give them a good life .

[hotair2]

Originally Posted by chicagonut

They have the final say when contraversional issues are presented to them to rule on their Constitutionality. Why do you keep spinning around in circles? When has Rowe vs Wade presented to them to rule on its Constitutionality?

They decide which cases that they want to hear. On Constitutional issues, they can decide whether to allow the appeals ct or district ct. holding stand or they can take it. There have been many attempts to have Rowe v. Wade overturned but the Supreme Ct. will not hear it. The question is why? I will wait patiently.

[hotair2]

Originally Posted by Taratova

Romney is leaving it alone.. Romney is not elected yet. Romney did say it could be reversed.

Of course it can be reversed. It was just a memo. He could send another memo out. Not very difficult.