Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2012, 07:34 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Two things:
1- Percentage of GDP is not a measure of spending.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So? May be you should try to understand why spending and revenue are measured against GDP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2012, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Partisanship Is An Intellectual/Emotional Handicap
1,851 posts, read 2,152,651 times
Reputation: 1082
I love all the Economists and Accountants in this thread, who don't even know who makes the decisions on spending money/allocating money. Seriously, you guys are hilarious.

It's like watching a bunch of doofuses argue about blaming a Grocery/Supermarket chain local store manager, for the prices of the product. When in fact it's corporate headquarters that makes those decisions. LOL!!!

Carry on fellas. Good comedy is hard to come by. Keep 'em coming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 07:38 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So, during first three years under Bush, spending increased by 23%, and only 8% under Obama.
Bull.. Spending jumped from $2.9T to $3.8T.. thats not 8%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,227,364 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
wrong
Prove it or get out of the thread. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 08:11 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Except no. Check your sources, OP. George Bush was and is the most spending president in world history.

Fail attempt to derail Obama...AGAIN.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Prove it or get out of the thread. Thanks.
Its already been proven, Obama has jumped spending by $900 BILLION, going from $2.9B, to $3.8B in only 3 1/2 years, and over those 3 1/2 years, the spending is estimated to exceed $14 Trillion, it took Bush about 6 years to do that.

Deficits under Obama in those 3 1/2 years, exceeded 8 years of Bush..

Check YOUR sources and stop embarassing yourself. Btw, who the hell designated you boss of the thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,603,285 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMyTree View Post
I'm no supporter or fan of Obama.

But this Peter Ferrara guys has a history of inaccurate nonsense and flinging horse manure against the wall, in hopes that it would stick long enough to scrub a few numbheads.

I'm against this administration (Obama's administration), but I'm not buying the manure Ferrara is selling.

Makes for sensationalistic trash and that's about it.

So go ahead, eat it up and swallow it down.

I'll pass.
Wasn't Ferrara one of Abramoff's beyatches?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So, during first three years under Bush, spending increased by 23%, and only 8% under Obama.
I would agree that Bush was a big spender. But your numbers are flawed. Try using some math.


Obama increased spending 17.9% in his first year, and has established a level of spending way beyond any other president in history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Our country is bigger than it has ever been. The near collapse of our economy requires hin to infue massive amouts of cash. All economists of any caliber say that by about 2018 or so our deficit with be 20 trillion or so no matter who is president. So wise up and admit that no matter who is POTUS WE ARE IN FOR A LONG HAUL. You don't fix in four years what took 8 years or more in the making..
So you agree with the post you are responding to. Obama is the all time big spender.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiosToreador View Post
Except no. Check your sources, OP. George Bush was and is the most spending president in world history.

Fail attempt to derail Obama...AGAIN.

You are correct. Bush spent more in 8 years than Obama in 3 years. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2012, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So, during first three years under Bush, spending increased by 23%, and only 8% under Obama.
And Bush was pilloried by both sides for spending like a drunken sailor; "unpatriotic" was the term 0bama used.

0bama increased the federal baseline spending by a trillion dollars, not 8%. Don't even try and use the lame, and dishonest tact, that 0bama only continued bush's EMERGENCY spending levels. As was pointed out in an earlier post, it would be just as asinine as the wife thinking that she can now spend $30,000 a month, because her hubby bought a $30,000 car in January.

This is why the lunatic left gets ZERO respect, you guys float ignorant and dishonest crap like "spending only increased by 8% under 0bama".

0bama spent a trillion more each year, at a time when we have reduced revenue........and...... he has his HHS, FDA, and EPA go out and ADD new punitive regulations that drive up the cost of energy, commerce and increased the day-to-day costs of living and for running a business.

Epic fail of leadership, and overall economic policy decision making, on 0bama's part. The nation is having troubles getting it's legs under it, and 0bama is busy kicking our legs out from under us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top