New poll indicates Americans ready for an Atheist President (dollars, claim, Utah)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not only ready but hoping to be able to vote for an openly atheist Presidential candidate in my lifetime. It's going to be great when we can finally get superstision out of the White House.
If his positions were what I think would match mine, then religion Would not matter
The reoality is that its still part of teh reality requiremnts if not sttaed. Obama even went to length to state his religoud beliefs .By tghe time they get to that posiiton most candidates have long since established a religous psotion of faith.
Some don't, by many do, and they invest a lot of time trying to prove there is no God. The state-atheism practiced in the countries we mentioned earlier did exactly that. They put in a lot of effort to brainwash people into becoming atheists. It was much easier with kids, of course.
One cannot be brainwashed into having faith, anymore than one can be brainwashed into not having faith. Faith is inherent, it is something that you either have or do not have, it cannot be given or taken. Recognizing that fact is what distinguishes atheists from anti-theists.
I do not care what anyone believes, or does not believe, providing they keep that belief, or the lack thereof, to themselves. What someone believes, or does not believe, neither "breaks my arm nor picks my pocket" to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson.
One cannot be brainwashed into having faith, anymore than one can be brainwashed into not having faith. Faith is inherent, it is something that you either have or do not have, it cannot be given or taken. Recognizing that fact is what distinguishes atheists from anti-theists.
I actually wouldn't be so sure. There are plenty of cults which managed to bestow a sense of faith onto their followers through brainwashing techniques. Now, whether the resulting belief is actually faith or not may be another question - but is certainly seems as though those who fall for this stuff interpret their beliefs as faith.
Faith is also a highly subjective term. I am often baffled when I hear about some tragedy in the news. Person X suffers some horrible fate and the family moves heavens and earth to save person X even though they claim to be devout Christians.
If they are, then why don't they have the faith that god will see person X through his injury or illness?
Even more amazing, when person X succumbs to his/her ailment, there always seems to be a family member who expresses faith that "god has a plan." Why then, if god had a plan all along, do these people think they ought to go against god's wishes? I thought they had faith that god knows best.
In other words, faith only seems to come into play in certain circumstances.
There are also plenty of people who "lose faith" or "find Christ" - which suggests that faith is not inherent for some people. To you and I it may seem as though our lack of faith in a higher being is inherent, but the reality is that neither of us knows what the future holds...
Thank you for distinguishing the difference between an atheist and an anti-theist. Atheists have no animosity toward any of the religions, but anti-theists do.
Even the term "anti-theist" isn't too clear:
Is an "anti-theist" someone who openly opposes religion (for whatever reason)?
If so, there are plenty of "anti-theists" in the US. Most of them happen to be religious. You see, the US separates Church and State, meaning that it is opposed to religious involvement in making laws (to the extend that this is reasonable). In other words, the US Constitution could be seen as "anti-theist" to some degree. It seems that most US citizens agree that such separation of Church and State should be upheld - for they do not desire to live in a theocracy. Does that mean that they are "anti-theist?"
Or does that term only mean forceful suppression of religion?
Having a secular, no-religion, government is to become exactly what the founders were against. This country was founded to separate/wall the government from crushing religious freedom. It has been turned around by secularists to mean religion not influencing government. Generally, these are the same people that revision history and call it fact.
Is an "anti-theist" someone who openly opposes religion (for whatever reason)?
If so, there are plenty of "anti-theists" in the US. Most of them happen to be religious. You see, the US separates Church and State, meaning that it is opposed to religious involvement in making laws (to the extend that this is reasonable). In other words, the US Constitution could be seen as "anti-theist" to some degree. It seems that most US citizens agree that such separation of Church and State should be upheld - for they do not desire to live in a theocracy. Does that mean that they are "anti-theist?"
Or does that term only mean forceful suppression of religion?
Yes. Antitheism is someone who is actively opposed to theism. They may be religious, or not. The US Constitution is not anti-theist. The US Constitution does not actively oppose religion, neither does it endorse a particular religion.
We had a man of God, a born again christian, GW Bush. He got us into two unfunded wars in which 100,000 plus Iraqis died, 7000 Americans, and scores injured and disabled at a cost of trillions of dollars. GW Bush claimed he spoke with God and his presidency crashed the country and killed thousands. I firmly believe we could do far better anyone who had no affiliation with any religion and even no belief in a higher being.
After all the damage GW Bush did I find it hard to believe that republicans selected a mormon. If Bush had no problem killing so many people and calling himself a BAC I can only imagine what a mormon will do with the power of the presidency.
We had a man of God, a born again christian, GW Bush. He got us into two unfunded wars in which 100,000 plus Iraqis died, 7000 Americans, and scores injured and disabled at a cost of trillions of dollars. GW Bush claimed he spoke with God and his presidency crashed the country and killed thousands. I firmly believe we could do far better anyone who had no affiliation with any religion and even no belief in a higher being.
After all the damage GW Bush did I find it hard to believe that republicans selected a mormon. If Bush had no problem killing so many people and calling himself a BAC I can only imagine what a mormon will do with the power of the presidency.
This says more about your phobia than about GW's presidency.
Yes. Antitheism is someone who is actively opposed to theism. They may be religious, or not. The US Constitution is not anti-theist. The US Constitution does not actively oppose religion, neither does it endorse a particular religion.
LOL. Many atheists are antitheists, and actively opposed to any existence of God, while others just don't believe in gods and leave it at that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.