Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who's killing infants (you know, that would mean already born)?
The r agenda is to do so, though.
Cut all social services for anyone who can't afford them; let kids suffer.
Hey, that's what their jebus would do.
Sick how you people continue to justify the taking the chance away from life as something as simply as a choice. Despicable.
If you were about choice, youd be appalled at what happened yesterday. We lost more choices yesterday.
And this did open up a can of worms. The government can now threaten us with buying something out of fear of a penalty (tax). They are now involved in our health...awesome.
Dimwitted democrats forget the purpose of the Constitution. Our founders wanted to put in place ways to LIMIT government power and oversight into our lives. Liberals have slowly but surely chipped away at the Constitution for years. This is a big blow to real freedom and real choice.
I do believe that an abortion is a heavy decision to make and that educating patients prior to their decision is important. I believe that if women are going to go for an abortion, it should be a completely imformed decision about what the procedure entails, any medical risks involved, and any lagging emotional risks involved. For many, this wouldn't change a thing. It may save some unborn babies, though.
Yes it is a heavy decision, but so is pregnancy and giving birth, especially to a child you are not emotionally or financially able to support. Therefore should we also make it mandtory to go into detail what pregnancy and childbirth entail and all of the medical risks involved, including birth defects and retardation and possible long term health problems and death for both the mother and child. And details of PPD and emotional risks of trying to raise a child you dont want or cant afford. Emotional risks from adoption and a study of the foster care and adoption system in our country. Are you at all familiar with our foster/adoption system? It might not change a thing for some women but it might increase the abortion rate.
But seriously to the OP you would tax a legal medical procedure. One that would most often save the taxpayers 10000000X what it will cost for medical expenses and providing for a child over the course of 18+ years. And what legal medical procedure would you tax next? Rehab, because people should'nt become addicted. Weight loss, because people shouldnt get fat. Lung cancer, because people shouldnt smoke. Birth control, because it kills any potential life? The possibilities are endless.
Sick how you people continue to justify the taking the chance away from life as something as simply as a choice. Despicable.
If you were about choice, youd be appalled at what happened yesterday. We lost more choices yesterday.
And this did open up a can of worms. The government can now threaten us with buying something out of fear of a penalty (tax). They are now involved in our health...awesome.
Dimwitted democrats forget the purpose of the Constitution. Our founders wanted to put in place ways to LIMIT government power and oversight into our lives. Liberals have slowly but surely chipped away at the Constitution for years. This is a big blow to real freedom and real choice.
Are you referring to all those "dim-witted Democrats" and "liberals" on the Supreme Court who upheld the Constitution yesterday???
$5,000 isn't enough, IMO. Liberals, you opened the box, and now you're going to have to live with it.
I disagree. A tax should address a problem. If you believe that abortion violates the unborn's right to life, then a tax on abortion does not solve the problem.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,363,738 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader
The 40 percent who are pro-abortion don't have the numbers to vote them out of they do so.
Can you actually document that 40% are pro-abortion or should we just take that statement for the deliberately misleading LIE it appears to be?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader
The people celebrating the SCOTUS decision really should think of the long term consequences.
The people whining about the SCOTUS decison really should learn the vast difference between choice and abortion before commenting on either.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
