Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691

Advertisements

It seems like we have a lot of posters here who like to act like the government is the source of malfeasance, incompetence, and corruption, and the private sector is the annointed, divine love child immmaculately conceived by Adam Smith and Ayn Rand. Therefore, we don't need thing like the EPA, Wall Street regulation,etc. We seem to be seeing an almost endless parade of shameless corporate scumbags these days.

Hence, I introduce an honorary term in this thread title to describe the corporate sleaze who are constantly trying to fleece their fellow citizens. Do some browsing to see of the fine innovations of our private sector. And they've been going on for a long time.

Corporate Crime Reporter

Wall Street - Salon.com

Barclays must face criminal investigation, says Ed Miliband | Business | guardian.co.uk

Personally, I think that government is the only thing that can possibly reign in scumbaggery, and it is of course doubly alarming when the same people who fleece their fellow citizens in the marketplace also run the government. Gratuitous sleaze is not what our country needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:20 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,772,004 times
Reputation: 2375
I believe that Amy Winehouse had a better term for it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,521,713 times
Reputation: 7807
We've been through this before:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robber_...(industrialist)

Since most American's don't know one bit about our history, the RWNJ proponents of returning to those days are completely unaware that it was exactly the greed and excesses of that era which led to the ideas of government regulation and the rise of unions as a matter of self-defense.

In other words, by supporting the elimination of government regulators, unions and social services, they're trying to recreate the very conditions which brought us those things in the first place!

Talk about a self-destructive policy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:32 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,811,170 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
It seems like we have a lot of posters here who like to act like the government is the source of malfeasance, incompetence, and corruption...
Yes, people should act like that only when we have a Republican president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:38 PM
 
3,393 posts, read 4,009,690 times
Reputation: 9310
Scumbaggery knows no bounds....

I am preparing to call a non-profit organization that is requesting a loan. They brought in $1.2 million last year and $500,000 of it went to salaries and benefits. Only $350,000 actually went to the people they were collecting it for.

Wait and see, they probably want a loan to buy a Mercedes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
I believe that Amy Winehouse had a better term for it...
Dang! (a scientist hates to be scooped!!!) What did she say, inquiring minds want to know!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:43 PM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,135,543 times
Reputation: 2356
Until government can clean up its own act, how do they have any business putting more regulation and limits on the private sector? We have plenty of liars, deceivers, and corruption in Washington, and people on the Left want to give them MORE power and MORE oversight over not just companies but PEOPLE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
We've been through this before:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robber_...(industrialist)

Since most American's don't know one bit about our history, the RWNJ proponents of returning to those days are completely unaware that it was exactly the greed and excesses of that era which led to the ideas of government regulation and the rise of unions as a matter of self-defense.

In other words, by supporting the elimination of government regulators, unions and social services, they're trying to recreate the very conditions which brought us those things in the first place!

Talk about a self-destructive policy!

Wow, ironic isn't it?

Those, add some juice to that claim that those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it...!

All the rage against unions...the nerve of those workers getting together and fighting for a fair deal. They might anger the job creators!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:48 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,073,562 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
I believe that Amy Winehouse had a better term for it...
Yes indeed, a dead drug addict is a great source for analysis....

A goverment is needed for basic needs..... an all powerful goverment that controls every aspect of life is tyranny
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
Until government can clean up its own act, how do they have any business putting more regulation and limits on the private sector? We have plenty of liars, deceivers, and corruption in Washington, and people on the Left want to give them MORE power and MORE oversight over not just companies but PEOPLE.
But, you see, the government is intended to serve THE PEOPLE. Corporations serve their shareholders. I am not arguing that government is free of nastiness, but it is the only hope most of us have to provide decent environment, safe living conditions, national defense, and basic health care. Corporations will not do those things unless they serve their short-term profit needs. And they will often do things for profit that undermine those very things. Not to say we do not need industry. Of course we do, but without constraints, crime and other consequences will ensue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top