Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies (Congress, illegal, attorney)

[PhoenixRisingAgain]

Disclosure forms reveal that Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a member of Congress from Florida, previously held funds with investments in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, and the state bank of India. This revelation comes mere days after the Democratic chair attacked presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for holding money in Swiss bank accounts in the past.

Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies, and the State Bank of India | The Weekly Standard

Deb is such an interesting girl.

[shorebaby]

COME CLEAN Ms. Wasserman Schultz!

[BucsLose]

She's a hypocritical pig.

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by BucsLose

She's a hypocritical pig.

Now, now let's be nice to pigs.

[wutitiz]

DNC chair needs to be an 'open book.' The peoples demand it!

[pknopp]

Is this where we make some generalization about the Dems in general? That's the way this is supposed to work, right?

[PhoenixRisingAgain]

Originally Posted by pknopp

Is this where we make some generalization about the Dems in general? That's the way this is supposed to work, right?

Only if its in response to making generalizations about Reps.

[Zimar]

Originally Posted by PhoenixRisingAgain

Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies, and the State Bank of India | The Weekly Standard

Deb is such an interesting girl.

Wait a second... did you actually read the article? These are 401k funds that invest in global companies. These are available to almost anyone, including myself and my own husband (we don't have big $$), and are part of a typical investment portfolio. This is MUCH DIFFERENT from what Mitt Romney did, which is a complex series of transactions that even the typical accountant or attorney would not fully understand.

The Vanity Fair article: Investigation: Mitt Romney

Compare for yourself.

[meson]

Originally Posted by Zimar

Wait a second... did you actually read the article? These are 401k funds that invest in global companies. These are available to almost anyone, including myself and my own husband (we don't have big $$), and are part of a typical investment portfolio. This is MUCH DIFFERENT from what Mitt Romney did, which is a complex series of transactions that even the typical accountant or attorney would not fully understand.

The Vanity Fair article: Investigation: Mitt Romney

Compare for yourself.

OOPS thread ender!

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by Zimar

Wait a second... did you actually read the article? These are 401k funds that invest in global companies. These are available to almost anyone, including myself and my own husband (we don't have big $$), and are part of a typical investment portfolio. This is MUCH DIFFERENT from what Mitt Romney did, which is a complex series of transactions that even the typical accountant or attorney would not fully understand.

The Vanity Fair article: Investigation: Mitt Romney

Compare for yourself.

So wait, I thought the left objected to his use of overseas accounts. So now the objection is that his transaction were complex? Or is it that he isn't like us? What's the problem with Romney's accounts? Which one do you consider illegal?