Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-18-2012, 04:25 PM
 
458 posts, read 616,251 times
Reputation: 362

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I wonder what makes anyone thing executives contribute enough to be paid these outrageous amounts.
The market. They're paid that much because the companies want them and pay them a lot to keep them despite the great difficulty of the job. It's called competition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
The Laffer Curve makes me laugh because of the complete absurdity of the idea.
So the concept that between:

A 100% tax that kills productivity and ultimately results in no revenue for the government
And a 0% tax that helps productivity but also results in no revenue for the government

... there is a spectrum of tax rates resulting in different corresponding productivity rates and revenue rates

... is completely laughable and ridiculous?

Did you have a recent head injury?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2012, 04:25 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester2138 View Post
I do know exactly what they are. Incorporating them would make my examples MORE extreme, not less extreme.

You know, there's actual data that I'm basing my statements on that you can look up if you want. Samples have even been posted in this very thread several times! Imagine, actual data to form opinions on!
Facts confuse them. The facts don't match the propaganda rhetoric with which they've been brainwashed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,201,401 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester2138 View Post
The market. They're paid that much because the companies want them and pay them a lot to keep them despite the great difficulty of the job. It's called competition.



So the concept that between:

A 100% tax that kills productivity and ultimately results in no revenue for the government
And a 0% tax that helps productivity but also results in no revenue for the government

... there is a spectrum of tax rates resulting in different corresponding productivity rates and revenue rates

... is completely laughable and ridiculous?

Did you have a recent head injury?
THE question is, did you?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 06:06 PM
 
458 posts, read 616,251 times
Reputation: 362
Simple facts and numbers are too much, eh? Have to resort to moronic cartoons? It's OK, we take pity on you. We will try to not make fun of you too much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
THE question is, did you?
Here are the top marginal tax rates 1916-2010: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dtRiXaMJ9X...es-650x603.png

And here is federal taxes as a percentage of GDP over about the same period: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3LjIWImQoP...TAXGDP1210.gif

As you can clearly see unless you're blind, top tax rates have fallen hugely while income tax revenue has actually... increased a bit.

That cartoon is cute, though, I guess.

Last edited by Jester2138; 07-18-2012 at 06:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 11:41 AM
 
640 posts, read 717,612 times
Reputation: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
THE question is, did you?
Interesting cartoon. Insert the phrase, "in this country", into the narrative and that fairly accurately describes the behavior of multinational corporations. Combine that with the feds antipathy toward small business (determined by what they do, not what they say) and it's little wonder companies choose to offshore while domestic competition is hijacked...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
I pay in way more than I take back so I would say I'm paying more than my fair share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 11:54 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10253
I really wish we could all just accept the laffer curve as reality then go about finding the actual point on the curve that properly balances the need for government revenue and private sector activity.

this debate over what tax rate is right is getting old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 12:29 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
I really wish we could all just accept the laffer curve as reality then go about finding the actual point on the curve that properly balances the need for government revenue and private sector activity.

this debate over what tax rate is right is getting old.
In a closed loop system where the U.S. could sustain itself without the need of anything foreign it would be an effective tax rate of 50%.

In the real world where the political leaders are trying as hard as they can to convince themselves and Americans that they'll be able to provide a better life for themselves and their children all the time that 50% level falls flat on its face.

The more we have to compete on a global scale the lower and lower that effective tax rate has to go and since it really can't get much lower we had to start charging stuff to the company (Federal Government) credit card.

It's simple really. Raise taxes to the 50% and start paying off the debt and you'll see exactly where your standard of living is suppose to be and after about 40 years or so you'll see this as your GDP per capita (PPP) $11,800 in 2011 dollars. Actually it will be a little higher but only because of technological advances and such.

Currently the GDP per capita (PPP) was $48,100 in 2011.

Now here's the kicker. You can keep funding your false lifestyle with lower taxes and more debt but all that really means is that when you hit rock bottom it's going to be a crash of monumental proportions. Right now it's just going to be horribly sucky to adjust to a new way of living for most Americans. Given the path we're on, in probably less than a decade or so, the crash will reach the monumental proportions level and it won't just be horribly sucky anymore, it'll be absolutely sick-like and will be something that makes the mythological Greek Gods, and their tragedies, jealous.

Considering all that was already occurring and had been for decades now how silly does Obamacare look when put into the grand scheme of things. You already didn't have the money for your already failing social safety net and now you'll have even less money because of Obamacare.



That graph is your refrence to how monumental the epic fail is going to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 02:58 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,455,098 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Now here's the kicker. You can keep funding your false lifestyle with lower taxes and more debt but all that really means is that when you hit rock bottom it's going to be a crash of monumental proportions. Right now it's just going to be horribly sucky to adjust to a new way of living for most Americans. Given the path we're on, in probably less than a decade or so, the crash will reach the monumental proportions level and it won't just be horribly sucky anymore, it'll be absolutely sick-like and will be something that makes the mythological Greek Gods, and their tragedies, jealous.

Burger flippers earning minimum wage and living in SRO housing are living way beyond their means and need to learn to live with even less than they have now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2012, 03:02 PM
 
567 posts, read 1,120,036 times
Reputation: 469
The upper end of "fair" to me is somewhere in the 30 to 40% range. "Taxes are the price of civilization", up to that point.

The bigger picture for me is what my taxes are paying for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top