Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,545,487 times
Reputation: 1951

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Do you think eventually, we will see a "grand bargain?" Almost every economist agrees we need a combination of spending cuts, more tax revenue, and entitlement reforms. Will the far left and far right agree to negotiate and actually get things done? I'm a liberal, but I agree we can't keep running up debt and we have to cut spending and reform entitlements. That said, we do need new tax revenue. At some point, conservatives have to choose between their ideology or actually reducing debt.
I think the best way for the Tea Party to win back a majority of Americans is to propose a change to the Grand Bargain where they give in to the demand of comprehensive immigration reform in return for full scale tax reform.

-Close the loopholes
-End the Bush Tax Cuts
-No more debt ceilings
-End the sequester

-in return-

-lower capital gains taxes to a 8% maximum
-cut the estate tax to a 10% maximum
-No amnesty for undocumented migrants who've been illegal in the U.S. less than five years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:07 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
If the government spends money, it's not stolen, it's gone out into the private sector somewhere. A balanced budget amendment may work if done over a long time and one that allowed for spending cuts and tax increases, would be one I could support.
And there you have it, a Obama supporter who doesn't understand the basics.

OP, no there will be no grand bargain. To have a grand bargain would require "NEGOTIATION" and we already know Obama "will not negotiate".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,217,585 times
Reputation: 6553
I think a fair question is: Do we want a grand bargain? The immigration reform bill is an example of such an attempt. It is nothing more than a porkulous spendfest that does very little to address the actual problems of our immigration system.
Quite honestly this nation can't afford any more grand bargains. Better to to take a slower more wise path. For any budget to get passed it must include real spending cuts. Our elected reps make it sound as though it is complicated. The only thing complicated is figuring out how to appease the special interests and still make cuts.
The Dems only interest in the immigration reform bill is to pander to 1 specific voting group.
Enforce existing laws and create tools to close the loopholes. Make E-Verify 100% mandatory. Make the fines for violations so costly that no one would risk getting caught. Include jail time for repeat offenders.
Our federal law enforcement. How many branches of Federal police do we need? merge and cut.
Military spending. Cut by 30%.
Foreign aid. Cut by 50%
EPA why does the EPA need a SWAT team? It is bloated beyond recognition.
Grand bargain? The only grand bargain we need is one that is about spending cuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,217,585 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
I think the best way for the Tea Party to win back a majority of Americans is to propose a change to the Grand Bargain where they give in to the demand of comprehensive immigration reform in return for full scale tax reform.

-Close the loopholes
-End the Bush Tax Cuts
-No more debt ceilings
-End the sequester

-in return-

-lower capital gains taxes to a 8% maximum
-cut the estate tax to a 10% maximum
-No amnesty for undocumented migrants who've been illegal in the U.S. less than five years
Close the loopholes. Agreed
End tax cuts: Agreed
End debt ceilings. Sure as soon as they pass a law that says no spending increases until all waste is eliminated.
End the sequester. Yes as soon as a balanced realistic budget is passed that actually reduces Federal spending to manageable levels.

No amnesty for Illegal aliens. Period. Pass laws that punish anyone who hires an illegal. make E-Verify mandatory. Include landlords. No renting to illegals. The illegals will have no means to profit from their behavior and they will self-deport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:34 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,545,487 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
I think a fair question is: Do we want a grand bargain? The immigration reform bill is an example of such an attempt. It is nothing more than a porkulous spendfest that does very little to address the actual problems of our immigration system.
Quite honestly this nation can't afford any more grand bargains. Better to to take a slower more wise path. For any budget to get passed it must include real spending cuts. Our elected reps make it sound as though it is complicated. The only thing complicated is figuring out how to appease the special interests and still make cuts.
The Dems only interest in the immigration reform bill is to pander to 1 specific voting group.
Enforce existing laws and create tools to close the loopholes. Make E-Verify 100% mandatory. Make the fines for violations so costly that no one would risk getting caught. Include jail time for repeat offenders.
Our federal law enforcement. How many branches of Federal police do we need? merge and cut.
Military spending. Cut by 30%.
Foreign aid. Cut by 50%
EPA why does the EPA need a SWAT team? It is bloated beyond recognition.
Grand bargain? The only grand bargain we need is one that is about spending cuts.
Now we are getting somewhere...

A few minor adjustments:

-100% cut for foreign aid except for aid after natural disasters
-Taper military spending down to 2003 levels instead of an immediate cut
-Increase aid to military families and decrease subsidies to military contractors
-Implement PAYGO
-Bipartisan agreement for a Balanced Budget Agreement

I really think we can get bipartisan support for this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:37 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,545,487 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Close the loopholes. Agreed
End tax cuts: Agreed
End debt ceilings. Sure as soon as they pass a law that says no spending increases until all waste is eliminated.
End the sequester. Yes as soon as a balanced realistic budget is passed that actually reduces Federal spending to manageable levels.

No amnesty for Illegal aliens. Period. Pass laws that punish anyone who hires an illegal. make E-Verify mandatory. Include landlords. No renting to illegals. The illegals will have no means to profit from their behavior and they will self-deport.
I'm sorry but that is a no go.

How are you going to break up a family with undocumented migrant parents with 12 or 13 year old American children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:17 AM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,966,662 times
Reputation: 7315
Boehner and the sane, mainstream non TP GOP and Obama struck a grand bargain. The TP terrorists deep sixed it.

The GOP will lose a few seats each cycle in the House, and when they get below 218, there will be a Grand Bargain. Since the GOP will have neither POTUS or Senate than, the wakeup call of being o for 3 ..like 2008..will get them to act like adults again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,759,513 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by mufc1878 View Post
Obama dropped the ball not running with simpson-bowles.

It would've put the R's on the defensive as Obama would show a tangible plan.

However, obama showed no backbone in taking the bi-partisan comissions recs (which were reasonable IMO) and I believe his circle felt that if they backed it, then the R's would use that as the 'end point' on the left and force Obama to come further right to 'meet them'.

There might be some political truths in that, but the populous would be best served if Obama had ran with Simpson-bowles and the R's agreed to it.
Well said. He missed a key strategic opportunity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 12:55 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,295,442 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Do you think eventually, we will see a "grand bargain?" Almost every economist agrees we need a combination of spending cuts, more tax revenue, and entitlement reforms. Will the far left and far right agree to negotiate and actually get things done? I'm a liberal, but I agree we can't keep running up debt and we have to cut spending and reform entitlements. That said, we do need new tax revenue. At some point, conservatives have to choose between their ideology or actually reducing debt.


No, but I hope we don't get a grand bargain. It won't work. Look cutting medicare or social security isn't going to save America anything at all. The costs will still be there, the need will still be there, all we will do is make people pick up the tab and cut back in other areas and get government spending in other ways to offset those increased expenses.

Social security, they just need to lift the cap.


The problem with Medicare is a problem with growing healthcare costs. So cutting Medicare doesn't take care of those increased healthcare costs, it doesn't save Americans anything. It just transfers the burden to families, most of whom incomes haven't kept up. It doesn't make any sense. The key to saving medicare is to control healthcare costs. If we significantly slow down the rate of growth in healthcare spending, then Medicare becomes more affordable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 01:05 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,545,487 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
No, but I hope we don't get a grand bargain. It won't work. Look cutting medicare or social security isn't going to save America anything at all. The costs will still be there, the need will still be there, all we will do is make people pick up the tab and cut back in other areas and get government spending in other ways to offset those increased expenses.

Social security, they just need to lift the cap.


The problem with Medicare is a problem with growing healthcare costs. So cutting Medicare doesn't take care of those increased healthcare costs, it doesn't save Americans anything. It just transfers the burden to families, most of whom incomes haven't kept up. It doesn't make any sense. The key to saving medicare is to control healthcare costs. If we significantly slow down the rate of growth in healthcare spending, then Medicare becomes more affordable.
All very good except first you'd need to get healthcare industry money out of the election campaigns and you can't do that until congress passes a law.

Congress would never pass a law depriving itself of a healthy gusher of cash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top