Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think Congress should raise taxes every time we go to war?
Yes, wars are expensive. 20 68.97%
Yes, and make the rich foot most of the bill. 10 34.48%
No, let the next generation bear the burden. 1 3.45%
No, let's continue borrowing from other countries. 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Austin
758 posts, read 590,871 times
Reputation: 185

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Yes. That was one of the bush administration's worst mistakes. Going to war on credit.
Correction! That was one of Bush's many mistakes. The list could stretch around my apartment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:54 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,491,545 times
Reputation: 3510
War expenses, expenses for natural disasters ... should be handled the same way a homeowners association deals with unplanned for expenses with special assessments. Balance the budget. Special assessments will help us have more involvement/control ... and hold Congress and the President(s) accountable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Austin
758 posts, read 590,871 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by KickAssArmyChick View Post
Congress needs to first Declare War... Per our CONSTITUTION.

That hasn't been done since WWII.

And no, I am sick of these pre-emptive BS wars that have nothing to do with our National Security and are breaking this country.
That's because there weren't as many corporate lobbyists involved in Congress back during World War II like there are today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Austin
758 posts, read 590,871 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
I thnik when people want somnehtig they should agree to having THEIR taxes raised no matter what it is.
;not someone else only.
Well how many people would want war if they knew their taxes would double or even triple which I think they should?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Austin
758 posts, read 590,871 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
War expenses, expenses for natural disasters ... should be handled the same way a homeowners association deals with unplanned for expenses with special assessments. Balance the budget. Special assessments will help us have more involvement/control ... and hold Congress and the President(s) accountable.
Natural disasters are out of our hands. Nobody could predict Katrina, the Joplin tornadoes, or whatever. To balance the budget though, they'd need to raise taxes in this economy. They've been lower than they have in the past 30 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 09:02 PM
 
419 posts, read 465,759 times
Reputation: 513
How about we start by saying that if Congress is going to authorize a war, THEIR children go first to the battle lines, their salaries get cut and their taxes go up. That way we'll know if they're serious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 10:53 PM
 
Location: Austin
758 posts, read 590,871 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagurl View Post
How about we start by saying that if Congress is going to authorize a war, THEIR children go first to the battle lines, their salaries get cut and their taxes go up. That way we'll know if they're serious.
That'll help, but that's not good enough. Their salaries and children alone won't cover the cost. Then they'll just send their children to live overseas the way George Romney did with his boy Mitt, or their kids will join the Air Guard or something. Make sure you raise their taxes at least a good 90% and cut their salaries by half.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 11:03 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,192,216 times
Reputation: 7693
The OP forgot another choice....

Lets have the 51% that pay no taxes and live off of welfare, food stamps, EBT cards and local handouts sell their expensive cars, their AC units, their X-Boxes, PS3's, Nintendo's, 50" HD TV's, all their gold and diamond jewelry, and give up drugs for the remainder of the war and turn all the money they made off their sold items back to the government.

That makes this raise tax rates more equitable for the remainder of Americans who do pay taxes and aren't baby factories....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 11:20 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,287,737 times
Reputation: 3580
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
The OP forgot another choice....

Lets have the 51% that pay no taxes and live off of welfare, food stamps, EBT cards and local handouts sell their expensive cars, their AC units, their X-Boxes, PS3's, Nintendo's, 50" HD TV's, all their gold and diamond jewelry, and give up drugs for the remainder of the war and turn all the money they made off their sold items back to the government.

That makes this raise tax rates more equitable for the remainder of Americans who do pay taxes and aren't baby factories....
So you characterize the majority of Americans as gold wearing drug using welfare and food stamp recipients who drive expensive cars ?

You seem to hate Americans more than Al Qaeda does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 11:22 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,964,883 times
Reputation: 7315
I would favor a surtax amendment where the tax automatically is eliminated at the conclusion of the war, on a prorated 1040 basis. So if war starts in Nov, 2013 and ends June, 2015, one pays 2/12 surtax in year 1, 12/12 in year 2, 6/12 in year 3. Surtax should be flat tax on the first 20k Gross, not adjusted taxable income. All benefit from the effort, and all should pay the same surtax assuming they gross 20k.

I would also want an amendment prohibiting Congress from adding the surtax for any other purpose. In short, make it a "No vote required" situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top