Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
not the NRA, how about the federal goverment instead. after all, how does a unemployed male with almost no money get ahold of $20k worth of supplies, firearms and bodyarmor that even most of the USA cannot get ahold of without the feds help.
just got back from vacation of 17 days, will be able to look through all these posts.
1st.
Looks like this 24 year old male had $20,000+ worth of firearms, body armor and more. looks to me to be more of a staged event by the feds than a single act only on the male responsible. if anyone thinks that the feds cant do this is just fooling themselves. i also noticed that this happened right about the same time that the UN is voting on the small arms treaty, kind of suspicious to me.
or he could have bought all of that thorough various internet websites that sell them as well. even the police said it was cheap crap.
Please check the supermarket, seems that you are missing out on the sale on tin foil
Money....a promiss to get away denied with a safety net far too perfectly engineered for insanity
guess what, you do not go into a movie theater fulled decked out in a complete set of body armor, murder all those people and then just give up to the cops. decked out like that I would have expected a full blown shoot out with the cops like in california during the 90's.
1. You don't know if anyone has identified Holmes as the shooter, or not. Everything the police department does in not recorded for the world to see in real time. You don't know if anyone has come forward to say they saw Holmes in the lobby or inside the theater. Most people would tell the police a thing like that but not go running off to the media to repeat it. In other words, just because you didn't hear a report of someone seeing him in the lobby doesn't mean such a report doesn't exist.
2. You're assuming that Holmes would be in the lobby with his flaming red hair in full view when he could have just as easily been wearing a hat to cover up so he'd blend in with the crowd until he was ready to do a 'big reveal' when he was damn good and ready.
3.
Baloney ... if someone had seen that clown head, they would have told the media by now. Everyone loves a little attention, and a little face time on TV. There is no gag order applicable to the public or the news media. That first witness that saw "the man" take a phone call and go to the emergency exit and open it, said it looked like he was looking for someone outside, or looking to call someone to the door. Obviously, as soon as the picture of Holmes was plastered all over the TV ... that witness would have fingered him as that guy, if it was that guy. And he made no mention of that guy wearing a hat!!
What we do know is that that witnesses (two) described the guy receiving the phone call as a normal looking guy, which would not define Carrot Top. We also have another witness who testified to witnessing someone other than the shooter toss a gas grenade from a different direction than where the shooter was standing. These reports were given to the media at the same time the police were reporting that they have not one piece of evidence or any indication that another person other than Holmes was involved. That is a BLATANT LIE on the surface, because three witnesses who claim there was a second person is at least an indication, even if it is not considered evidence.
That's the reality, your mental gymnastics notwithstanding. You should take this act to London.
guess what, you do not go into a movie theater fulled decked out in a complete set of body armor, murder all those people and then just give up to the cops.
And you would know this how?
Quote:
decked ot like that I would have expected a full blown shoot out with the cops like in california during the 90's.
this was not a bank robbery and that was four men.
or he could have bought all of that thorough various internet websites that sell them as well. even the police said it was cheap crap.
Please check the supermarket, seems that you are missing out on the sale on tin foil
better look at that head of yours for the tin foil, after all it is a democrat administration that got a border agent murdered. I would not put it past any administration, whether it be republican or democrat to do their best to limit the freedoms of the people. after all, ole gw gave us the tsa and homeland security.
It's imposible to do. You refute any evidence other than what you can pull of some lone dudes blog or otherwise conspiracy site that you happen to agree with.
Now, let's play. It's YOUR job to prove that I am wrong.
guess what, you do not go into a movie theater fulled decked out in a complete set of body armor, murder all those people and then just give up to the cops. decked ot like that I would have expected a full blown shoot out with the cops like in california during the 90's.
oh yes you would if you just realized a total betrayal....ch time 10 in the appearance, listen-watch...perfectly sane ( as the charge is uttered
Stop being hysterical. No one is taking your guns away.
not yet they are not, give it time. sooner or later the feds will get enough courage to limit more freedoms of the people. reagan, gw1st, clinton and gw2nd all did it. i expect obama will be just like the rest and do his best to limit the freedoms of the people too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.