Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Prove it. I'll trust the intel of every Western intelligence agency over a partisan narrative put forth by DNC party hacks to help win an election.
Show me pics of US troops standing near all the WMD they found.
Bottom line is that if we didn't find them, it doesn't matter....they aren't there. And until they're found in some Iraqi bunker somewhere, no one with half a brain is going to believe they were EVER there.
It doesn't matter who thought what....there are no WMD's in Iraq.
Point blank..bottom line. Let it go people. Geez...
I can't believe that all these years later, you're still trying to acquit Bush from his misadventure in Iraq.
It was a huge ass mistake, and everyone seems to know it except for CD conservatives.
Explain why every intelligence agency in the Western World thought Iraq had WMD if it wasn't true.
Do you know what Saddam was doing on a day-to-day basis during the year before the U.S. coalition invaded. Answer: NO. He could have easily moved or destroyed weapons.
It doesn't matter who thought what....there are no WMD's in Iraq.
Point blank..bottom line. Let it go people. Geez...
I can't believe that all these years later, you're still trying to acquit Bush from his misadventure in Iraq.
It was a huge ass mistake, and everyone seems to know it except for CD conservatives.
Well I guess the whole world was wrong huh? They did not find any because they were moved. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of the WMDs. Did you even read the snopes article?
Explain why every intelligence agency in the Western World thought Iraq had WMD if it wasn't true.
Do you know what Saddam was doing on a day-to-day basis during the year before the U.S. coalition invaded. Answer: NO. He could have easily moved or destroyed weapons.
Because they're a bunch of idiots.
And no, they Saddam couldn't have EASILY destroyed those weapons. That's nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty011
Well I guess the whole world was wrong huh? They did not find any because they were moved. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of the WMDs. Did you even read the snopes article?
Yea, the whole world was wrong. Did we find the WMD's in Iraq? Damn...you guys are trying to make something that is simple into a complicated issue. No WMD's found means no WMD's there. Simple.
We got lied to by people that would stop at nothing to find a way to invade Iraq. In other words, we got had, and we listened to what we wanted to listen to.
Hans Blix was in the process of proving that there was nothing to find when he was ordered out of Iraq so that Bush could invade. Had he waited sixty days it would have been summer and the temperatures would have been prohibitive for an invasion, so W HAD to go to war RIGHT NOW!!!!!
If you have pix, put 'em up, give us a link to them, or be completely disbelieved.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
