Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:43 PM
 
Location: New London County, CT
8,949 posts, read 12,150,821 times
Reputation: 5145

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Secchamps98 View Post
Your wrong here..I am with a big company. We will be hit with many millions of new taxes with healthcare law next year. We are definately passing the amount in new taxes we pay in prices to consumers.....that means more out of pocket expenses at the hospital...
I'd like to what know what business paid "many millions in new taxes" for a law that hadn't even been implemented yet.

Lies predicated on mistruths....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:44 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,866,297 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Too bad it doesn't work that way in real life.
Yes, it does, in the vast majority of cases.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Your point is that taxes = price increase. I'm saying you can't make a simplistic connection like that b/c there's more to factoring in price than just taxes. Taxes are just one part of overhead. Wages, benefits, rent, utilities, loan repayments, etc. All these contribute to overhead. If the gov't raises corporate taxes, and company A offers dental insurance and company B doesn't and all the other overhead is equal, then company A has the option to cut it's dental insurance program to offset the tax hike. Company B doesn't and it can't raise prices b/c Company A is still charging the pre-tax-hike price.
If company A and company B are already offering different benefits, who do you think is retaining the best employees and therefore producing the best product? It's more than just widget prices, fine, but when you lower overhead, where does that money go? In the vast majority of cases, competition stops it from just disappearing into someone's pocket. That's not competitive behavior, so in a competitive market, it won't last long.

I mean, are you really making the argument that overhead does not matter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,120,508 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secchamps98 View Post
Your point is that taxes = price increase. I'm saying you can't make a simplistic connection like that b/c there's more to factoring in price than just taxes. Taxes are just one part of overhead. Wages, benefits, rent, utilities, loan repayments, etc. All these contribute to overhead. If the gov't raises corporate taxes, and company A offers dental insurance and company B doesn't and all the other overhead is equal, then company A has the option to cut it's dental insurance program to offset the tax hike. Company B doesn't and it can't raise prices b/c Company A is still charging the pre-tax-hike price.

That's why it's too simplistic to just say taxes = price increases.


Your wrong here..I am with a big company. We will be hit with many millions of new taxes with healthcare law next year. We are definately passing the amount in new taxes we pay in prices to consumers.....that means more out of pocket expenses at the hospital...
That's your company's choice. If another company has that same choice to make and that price increase is the difference between keeping & losing customers, they'll find somewhere else to offset the hike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,943,934 times
Reputation: 3416
I am a small business owner... I'm going to pass the cost on to my customers and they expect me to... They in turn will pass my increases as well as their own on to their customers.... Double whammy.. Enjoy the increased cost!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,120,508 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Yes, it does, in the vast majority of cases.



If company A and company B are already offering different benefits, who do you think is retaining the best employees and therefore producing the best product? It's more than just widget prices, fine, but when you lower overhead, where does that money go? In the vast majority of cases, competition stops it from just disappearing into someone's pocket. That's not competitive behavior, so in a competitive market, it won't last long.

I mean, are you really making the argument that overhead does not matter?
Are you serious?! Where do I even come close to saying overhead doesn't matter?

Read this again and judge for yourself if I'm making the argument that overhead doesn't matter:

Quote:
Some companies have more room to offset taxes in other places that aren't price increases, so that forces competitors to also offset in places that aren't price increases, unless the want to risk being uncompetitive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,120,508 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
I am a small business owner... I'm going to pass the cost on to my customers and they expect me to... They in turn will pass my increases as well as their own on to their customers.... Double whammy.. Enjoy the increased cost!!
And if you get a tax cut, are you also passing that on to your customers...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,943,934 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
And if you get a tax cut, are you also passing that on to your customers...
Yeah, I will have to, in order to remain competative... Right now, small business is strapped to the wall, we are going to pass on ANY increases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:02 PM
 
45,642 posts, read 27,250,610 times
Reputation: 23923
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
If you want to understand, you can do the work. You have to want to understand more than I want you to understand! This is America! Lift yourself by your bootstraps and DO THE WORK... The context is obvious with minimal reading comprehension! Good luck!
I'm asking you for your interpretation of a statement you made. The only way I learn is asking the source of the statement, which is you.

You are obviously making statements that you not only can't back up, but don't understand yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,120,508 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Yeah, I will have to, in order to remain competative... Right now, small business is strapped to the wall, we are going to pass on ANY increases.
And if some of your competitors decide to keep their prices the same and make cuts elsewhere should taxes increase, will you do the the same to remain competitive or still just pass it on to your customers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 03:06 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,866,297 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Are you serious?! Where do I even come close to saying overhead doesn't matter?
You're saying that even if we lower overhead, prices will remain the same. So what happens if we increase overhead? What happens if we increase overhead, then next year, we decrease it, will prices go down then?

It's not a sound argument. It's predicated on assumptions and anecdotes, such as the one that one of two direct competitors has some magical way to offset taxes that is somehow out of reach of the others.

Again, the most competitive company will come out on top. You lower overhead on all companies, you give all companies room to undercut their current pricing and that of their competitors. With any type of competition in the marketplace, this will happen. These are basic economic realities.

How can you argue with the fact that lower overhead allows for lower prices? And if you accept that, how can you argue with the fact that if competition exists, companies will attempt to undercut their competitors?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top