Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2012, 11:22 PM
 
3,201 posts, read 3,857,922 times
Reputation: 1047

Advertisements

The article has been peer reviewed by senior fellows; therefore, I do not have to use my own brain to read something so boring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2012, 11:30 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber View Post
The article is unreadable..
The dialectical nature of climate change is a striking confirmation of the philosophy of dialectical materialism developed by the founders of scientific socialism,

"the transformation of quantity and quality - mutual penetration of polar opposites and transformation into each other when carried to extremes - development through contradiction or negation of the negation."


Marx is turgid enough without someone trying to shoe horn a socioeconomic analysis of 19th century Europe on to 21st century science for no other reason than an futile attempt at breathing new life into a defunct socioeconomic theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2012, 11:32 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The dialectical nature of climate change is a striking confirmation of the philosophy of dialectical materialism developed by the founders of scientific socialism,
"the transformation of quantity and quality - mutual penetration of polar opposites and transformation into each other when carried to extremes - development through contradiction or negation of the negation."


Marx is turgid enough without someone trying to shoe horn a socioeconomic analysis of 19th century Europe on to 21st century science for no other reason than an futile attempt at breathing new life into a defunct socioeconomic theory.
If everyone could understand Marxist writings there would be no Marxists. It is multi-syllable gobbledy gunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top