Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For years the liberal wing and Obama clan have been making a joke about the chemical weapons not found in Iraq
Has anyone actually seen any chemical weapons in Syria?..Other than the word of some spy who doesn't seem to exist?...There were a few like him in Iraq, weren't there?...You know, who the liberals exposed as hoaxes.
The Iraquis also bought equipment for chemical production...Just like the Syrians.
At the invasion , the liberals would not accept the concept that the weapons were sent to Syria (does anyone remember this)...But that was a hoax also....wasn't it?
There's no reason for us to make the same mistake again (by getting involved in Syria) like we did in Iraq...Isn't this correct?
Iraq could not produce chemical weapons because the US and the UN conducted Desert Storm in the early 90's, which essentially bombed Iraq back to the stone age. Prior to the invasion, Iran bombed the crap out of Iraq for 8 years. So basically Iran destroyed all of Iraqs chemical weapons facilities, and what was left was destroyed by the USA
Iraq could not produce chemical weapons because the US and the UN conducted Desert Storm in the early 90's, which essentially bombed Iraq back to the stone age. Prior to the invasion, Iran bombed the crap out of Iraq for 8 years. So basically Iran destroyed all of Iraqs chemical weapons facilities, and what was left was destroyed by the USA
Bombed them with what? Molotov cocktails? Iran has not attacked anyone in over 200 years. Saddam Hussein invaded Iran. Iraq was the aggressor.
For years the liberal wing and Obama clan have been making a joke about the chemical weapons not found in Iraq
Has anyone actually seen any chemical weapons in Syria?..Other than the word of some spy who doesn't seem to exist?...There were a few like him in Iraq, weren't there?...You know, who the liberals exposed as hoaxes.The Iraquis also bought equipment for chemical production...Just like the Syrians.
At the invasion , the liberals would not accept the concept that the weapons were sent to Syria (does anyone remember this)...But that was a hoax also....wasn't it?
There's no reason for us to make the same mistake again (by getting involved in Syria) like we did in Iraq...Isn't this correct?
It is my belief that the Iraquis heard that George Bush was "comin' to get them" and they moved all their chemical weapons to Syria. If that is the case Shame On YOU Syria for aiding and abetting a bunch of morons and some of us owe George and apology. He hung tough to his belief and lo and behold POOF these weapons mysteriously appear after he is out of office and things have "somewhat" quieted down. Now...it will be interesting to see just what Obama is going to do about this predicament if anything. I cannot imagine going thru another episode of being afraid like we were after 911..afraid of something as simple as opening our mail..strange packages and stranger people. I can recall having to evacuate the building where I worked; a local gas company, because of strange white powder. Chemical weapons in Syria?? I am not surprised and George.....apologies sent your way!!
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,830,626 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by migee
For years the liberal wing and Obama clan have been making a joke about the chemical weapons not found in Iraq
Has anyone actually seen any chemical weapons in Syria?..Other than the word of some spy who doesn't seem to exist?...There were a few like him in Iraq, weren't there?...You know, who the liberals exposed as hoaxes.
The Iraquis also bought equipment for chemical production...Just like the Syrians.
At the invasion , the liberals would not accept the concept that the weapons were sent to Syria (does anyone remember this)...But that was a hoax also....wasn't it?
There's no reason for us to make the same mistake again (by getting involved in Syria) like we did in Iraq...Isn't this correct?
For years the liberal wing and Obama clan have been making a joke about the chemical weapons not found in Iraq
Has anyone actually seen any chemical weapons in Syria?..Other than the word of some spy who doesn't seem to exist?...There were a few like him in Iraq, weren't there?...You know, who the liberals exposed as hoaxes.
The Iraquis also bought equipment for chemical production...Just like the Syrians.
At the invasion , the liberals would not accept the concept that the weapons were sent to Syria (does anyone remember this)...But that was a hoax also....wasn't it?
There's no reason for us to make the same mistake again (by getting involved in Syria) like we did in Iraq...Isn't this correct?
NO ONE SAID THAT IRAQ COULDN'T EVER MAKE CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Hell, we Gave Saddam (Reagan and Bush administrations) chemicals and viruses that are used to make weapons of. We also gave him the means to deliver those weapons.
But he didn't have the ability to make those things after the first Iraq war and the weapons inspectors did their jobs.
See the differnce between the words ever, and later?
Saddam no doubt sold some of that technology to the Syrians, ok.
The Iraq war was sold on nuclear weapons, which Iraq never had.
The newspaper says a review of a large tranche of government documents reveals that the administrations of President Reagan and the first President Bush both authorized providing Iraq with intelligence and logistical support, and okayed the sale of dual use items — those with military and civilian applications — that included chemicals and germs, even anthrax and bubonic plague.
Iraq could not produce chemical weapons because the US and the UN conducted Desert Storm in the early 90's, which essentially bombed Iraq back to the stone age. Prior to the invasion, Iran bombed the crap out of Iraq for 8 years. So basically Iran destroyed all of Iraqs chemical weapons facilities, and what was left was destroyed by the USA
YA might want to study history a bit. Iraq (Saddam) USED chemical weapons on his own people (Kurds) AFTER GWI. I believe they had also used them against Iran a number of times over the years.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
