Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-02-2012, 06:07 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,299 posts, read 54,213,280 times
Reputation: 40623

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Of course, in real science, the burden of proof is to disprove the null hypothesis. The balance of data thus far seems to refute the concept of man-made global warming. Thus, the "theory" of global warming is very, very shaky, at best.

At this point, man-made global warming is unproven conjecture and has not held up to rigid scrutiny. Those who embrace man-made global warming as fact are the antithesis of valid science and simply make fools of themselves by declaring this hoax to be "proven true". Obviously these proponants have never conducted an actual bench experiment, never written a paper for a peer reviewed scientific journal, have never reviewed any scientific papers as a part of the editorial process and have no knowledge of statistics.

In short, if you have no actual professional experience in conducting bench science and writing in the literature, your views are amateurish and ill conceived at best. It simply makes you look ridiculous.
I haven't seen any writungs from you that would make me believe your O-P-I-N-I-O-N holds much value.

It's pretty damn obvious that IF as the OP has stated the focus of the article is scientists do not yet understand well enough that the heading of the thread, "Yet more proof", is hyperbolic BS, nothing more.

In my opinion it is YOU looking ridiculous
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2012, 08:15 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,169,069 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber View Post
Global Warming is not Science.

really? according to alot of democrats it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 09:47 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,169,069 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
The denialist movement is so cultish its somewhat amusing to watch. I'm glad that this fringe is only limited to the United States, I don't think the cult of denial is nearly as pervasive anywhere else as you find in the United States.

Most of the world does not believe their eyes are lying, but they probably don't listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch FOX Noise 24/7 either for their "scientific" analysis

we all know that climate change has always happened, and climate change will always be there, but global warming is nothing but a global hogwash put on by the goverments just wanting to tax the people more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,212 posts, read 19,471,341 times
Reputation: 21678
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
Please don't confuse what you "know" with what we actually know.
It's easy to brainwash the uninformed, what I often wonder though is how they can continually deny the obvious.

Quote:
Here are some hard numbers about climate change: June broke or tied 3,215 high-temperature records across the United States. That followed the warmest May on record for the Northern Hemisphere – the 327th consecutive month in which the temperature of the entire globe exceeded the 20th-century average, the odds of which occurring by simple chance were 3.7 x 10-99, a number considerably larger than the number of stars in the universe.
Read more: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 10:05 PM
 
29,409 posts, read 21,967,571 times
Reputation: 5455
Wait a minute are you saying that the earth may actually take care of the problem itself. When there is a lot of co2 it finds somewhere to "sink" and when there isn't as much it finds its way into the atmosphere? How can this be possible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 10:09 PM
 
29,409 posts, read 21,967,571 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
It's easy to brainwash the uninformed, what I often wonder though is how they can continually deny the obvious.



Read more: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Who peer reviews Rolling Stone research? Spin Magazine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 11:15 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,423,185 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Just another thing that shows mankind doesn't understand the global environment and how wrong the "GW experts" are......

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture11299.html

Amount of CO2 being sucked away by Earth 'has doubled in 50 years'
It's a mischaracterization to say that the study "proves" or "disproves" anything about the sources and magnitudes (or lack thereof) of global warming. It does suggest is that the cycle of carbon dioxide emission-to-uptake is not thoroughly known and that the planet has greater abilities to counteract CO2 than previously thought. But that does not necessarily mean that there is no global warming - or that CO2 won't continue to exponentially increase. The question will be if the planet can continue to match that exponential increase. Maybe, maybe not... we don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2012, 11:35 PM
 
29,409 posts, read 21,967,571 times
Reputation: 5455
Yeah but it won't stop the "warmers" from trying to create their man made hurricanes or dumping iron into the ocean and other nonsense. I mean all those ships sunk and cargo lost during WWII haven't stopped it according to them but a boat full of idiots tossing iron into the sea will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 12:23 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,917,807 times
Reputation: 7365
Which artical was about the iron being tossed over board? I seem to be missing the link. I just gotta see that ..LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 01:18 PM
 
29,409 posts, read 21,967,571 times
Reputation: 5455
They been on this for a while. They also got man made volcanoes they're working on. Who knows what other nonsense. These loons will destroy the planet long before any global warming will.

Scientists Propose Dumping Iron into Ocean to Stop Global Warming
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top