Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:49 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 18,999,262 times
Reputation: 5224

Advertisements

I'll be the first to say that I know very little about the Great Lakes area. On a map, the amount of land covered by water looks HUGE. Why doesn't agriculture take advantage of this vast water source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:50 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,238,044 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
I'll be the first to say that I know very little about the Great Lakes area. On a map, the amount of land covered by water looks HUGE. Why doesn't agriculture take advantage of this vast water source?

Pretty much is that they have had plenty of rain this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:52 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,927,795 times
Reputation: 11790
Well, it rains enough in the Great Lakes region and the potential evaporation rate is well within the range of a humid climate. I don't get what your point is with this topic. This should be posted in the Weather forum, I don't see how this is in any way controversial or political
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Central, IL
3,382 posts, read 4,079,983 times
Reputation: 1379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Pretty much is that they have had plenty of rain this year.
yeah, okay... I think you would know better then that. the midwest and the crops here in the midwest is struggling due to the severe drought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:53 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,927,795 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhawkins74 View Post
yeah, okay... I think you would know better then that. the midwest and the crops here in the midwest is struggling due to the severe drought.
For one year. The other years were fine. The cost to pipe water from the Great Lakes out to the Midwest would greatly outweigh any benefit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
Most of the time the grain and corn farmers get plenty of rain so investing in transfering by canals or pumping Great Lakes water to Iowa is not worth it. They just buy crop insurance for the times the rain stays away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,200,962 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
For one year. The other years were fine. The cost to pipe water from the Great Lakes out to the Midwest would greatly outweigh any benefit
Actually, water from the great lakes watershed cannot be piped out of the watershed. There has been talk about a pipeline for years but it will never happen. If you want to enjoy our water move here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:57 AM
 
78,385 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49663
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
For one year. The other years were fine. The cost to pipe water from the Great Lakes out to the Midwest would greatly outweigh any benefit
There is plenty of water around in some of the hard-hit areas of Illinois so you wouldn't really even have to pipe water over. However, the cost of installing an irrigation system on a farm by farm basis is typically prohibitive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Central, IL
3,382 posts, read 4,079,983 times
Reputation: 1379
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
For one year. The other years were fine. The cost to pipe water from the Great Lakes out to the Midwest would greatly outweigh any benefit
I agree, the costs would make no sense at all, but the poster I replied to claimed the area has had plenty of rain this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2012, 12:00 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,000,960 times
Reputation: 5455
Folks have been suing over who actually controls the lakes for years. By the time they figure it all out the lakes will be a desert and folks will have moved on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top