Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2012, 06:52 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,532,093 times
Reputation: 5452

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trader8 View Post
LMAO ... looks like the pressure is starting to get to Paul Ryan-Akin

 
Old 08-31-2012, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,831,906 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Because it's freaking common sense!

This is a potato.
This is a forcible potato.

Common sense dictates that potato doesn't need to be redefined in legislation, unless you want to redefine the potato.
 
Old 08-31-2012, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,831,906 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
The age does not apply in every state and I agree that a 16 year old knows better. But what about a 13 yr with a 20 yr old.

Ok again with Wikipedia....The authors and others do not pass legislation. No one should be able to tell a woman what she should be able to do with her body because of a definitition or degree of how she was violated or abused.
Republicans bear to differ.
 
Old 08-31-2012, 09:19 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,730,892 times
Reputation: 20852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
Dont put words in my mouth. There is a difference between statutory rape and rape. A 16 year old could have sex with a 25 year old willingly. You are talking about pedophiles, an entirely different sick matter.
And those distinctions matter in relation to the legislation in question how? EXACTLY?
 
Old 08-31-2012, 09:23 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,730,892 times
Reputation: 20852
I think we are missing the point.

Ryan added the word forcible, to the legislation in an attempt to narrow who qualifies for rape based exemptions. Meaning unless the person can prove they were FORCIBLY raped than they do not qualify for the exemption. Date raped? Drugged and raped? Raped by someone holding a knife to your throat but leaving no marks aka coersion rape? Etc, all denied.

Nice.
 
Old 08-31-2012, 09:54 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,461,160 times
Reputation: 12597
All rape is forced. That's what makes it distinct from sex. Forced doesn't always mean in a physical sense either--social clout, emotional blackmailing, and other psychological techniques can be used to metaphorically "hold a gun to someone's head".
 
Old 08-31-2012, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Legitamate" rape - as used by Akin - was a misspeak - but he meant it as a distinguishment between rape that is falsely alleged as have occurring(false police reports) and factual instances of rape.

It is true that in times of stress that fertilization is unlikely to occur.

The Democrats ignored the existance of women who falsely accuse men of rape - and interpreted Akin's phrase falsely.

There is no such thing as as "legitimate rape" - rape is a disgusting, absolutly wrong crime. Just as wrong are women who falsely accuse men of committing rape - and these accusations are made much more often than we would like to think.

Only someone who hates men - would advocate for the acceptance of false accusations of rape - and support the women who make these despicable allegations.

Any man who rapes a woman is despicable - and those are the "people" - i prefer to call them animals - whom Mr. Akin was referring to when he spoke of "legitimate" rape.

Last edited by Harrier; 08-31-2012 at 10:43 PM..
 
Old 08-31-2012, 10:39 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,428,143 times
Reputation: 31495
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
Ryan Refuses to Explain “Forcible” Rape as Dems Attempt More Akin-izing of the GOP Ticket - ABC News

“You sponsored legislation that has the language ‘forcible rape,’” Delano noted. “What is forcible rape as opposed…”
“Rape is rape,” Ryan interrupted. “Rape is rape, period. End of story.”
“So that forcible rape language meant nothing to you at the time?” Delano asked.
“Rape is rape and there’s no splitting hairs over rape,” Ryan said.

So, Ryan sponsors stuff and has no idea what adjectives do to other words in a sentence?
He doesn't care about the wording. If rape is rape, why abitrarily define it "forcible."

I mean, from what he had on paper, there's "forcible rape", and then there's "lovingly, tenderly stroking your hair, but I'm still raping you", rapes.
I bet that second kind is the one Romney used on businesses when he "consulted".
 
Old 08-31-2012, 10:49 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,428,143 times
Reputation: 31495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Legitamate" rape - as used by Akin - was a misspeak - but he meant it as a distinguishment between rape that is falsely alleged as have occurring(false police reports) and factual instances of rape.

It is true that in times of stress that fertilization is unlikely to occur.

The Democrats ignored the existance of women who falsely accuse men of rape - and interpreted Akin's phrase falsely.

There is no such thing as as "legitimate rape" - rape is a disgusting, absolutly wrong crime. Just as wrong are women who falsely accuse men of committing rape - and these accusations are made much more often than we would like to think.

Only someone who hates men - would advocate for the acceptance of false accusations of rape - and support the women who make these despicable allegations.

Any man who rapes a woman is despicable - and those are the "people" - i prefer to call them animals - whom Mr. Akin was referring to when he spoke of "legitimate" rape.
Is it really true? Can you cite even one single shred of proof? Please elaborate.
 
Old 09-01-2012, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Maryland
629 posts, read 946,173 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
I think we are missing the point.

Ryan added the word forcible, to the legislation in an attempt to narrow who qualifies for rape based exemptions. Meaning unless the person can prove they were FORCIBLY raped than they do not qualify for the exemption. Date raped? Drugged and raped? Raped by someone holding a knife to your throat but leaving no marks aka coersion rape? Etc, all denied.

Nice.
He didn't add the word, or at least, it seems unlikely. The bill was originally introduced with over 250 sponsors and the word "forcible." Who knows who put it in? A staffer? One of over 250 other people than Ryan? But between the bill introduction and its final reporting in the House, the word "forcible" was removed. There's plenty to criticize Ryan for, but this is making a mountain of a molenill.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top