Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:11 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 23 days ago)
 
12,956 posts, read 13,671,429 times
Reputation: 9693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
So you are ADMITTED that Obama FAILED.

He wanted the job in 2008.

He PROMISED he'd fix the economy by his 3rd year in office or else he wouldn't deserve re-election.

He PROMISED 5.2% unemployment by now.

He PROMISED to cut the deficit in half.

Which one of those things did he deliver on????
The Tea Party failed too, they said they were going to fix this, they have had more time than the President has had by now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
FACT: Obama is still a net jobs killer | WashingtonExaminer.com
Americans Employed, January 2009: 142,187,000
Americans Employed, today: 142,101,000


Jobs in U.S. Economy, January 2009: 133,561,000
Jobs in U.S. Economy, today: 133,300,000

The USA gained LESS jobs in September than it did in August.
The USA gained LESS jobs in August than it did in July.
Private Sector Payroll (in thousands)
Jan 2001: 111,631 (Bush takes office)
Jan 2005: 110,718 (Bush's first term resulted in -913K fewer private sector jobs)
Jan 2009: 110,985 (Bush's second term saw +267K private sector jobs)
Sep 2012: 111,499 (+514K jobs since the day Obama took office)

Even as we assume immediate effect of President's policies, on day 1, more private sector jobs have been added in 45 months with Obama as the President than in eight years before him. In fact, private sector employment was LOWER in Jan 2009 than it was in Jan 2001.

And only an idiot would assume that a President can have an influence on economic conditions on day 1. Otherwise, we should be blaming Reagan for the conditions beginning in Jan 1981, Carter in Jan 1977, and Bush on Jan 2001. Personally, I feel, 6-8 months is what ANY President deserves for something like economy that takes a while to take effect, just as budgets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:17 AM
 
46,276 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I am not looking at an idiots version of it, but straight from the horses mouth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
It was the only refuge to prop-up the economy that had struggled for nearly all of his first term with republicanism in effect. It makes for a very inconvenient fact for these stupid right wingers to accept that at the end of Bush's four years, with republican congress at hand, net increase in private sector jobs was: -913K.

Well, did I call it an increase? The size of private sector payroll was SMALLER at the end of his first term by nearly a million jobs! And these idiots present self as "job creators". BUT, they did create jobs eventually... for a couple of years and we should send a thank you letter to each of the five financial giants who "sacrificed" self by being allowed to lend with leverage at over 30:1!

But, the ignorant would rather blame FDR, Carter, Clinton and now Obama for it.

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww... ..

Are we a little pissed that you have to strat calling people names....because they don't agree with you?

I'd put you on ignor, but you posts are getting to damn funny, kinda like ole joe....the other night...a nervous breakdown....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww... ..

Are we a little pissed that you have to strat calling people names....because they don't agree with you?
Because they are idiots and political correctness is not my style.

Quote:
I'd put you on ignor, but you posts are getting to damn funny, kinda like ole joe....the other night...a nervous breakdown....
You should, especially if you prefer PC. I don't think you can handle being put in place. At least you will get a good sleep more often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:20 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,714,837 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I am not looking at an idiots version of it, but straight from the horses mouth.
That IS THE White House's Graph!!!!!!


Predicting the financial crisis - The Washington Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
That IS THE White House's Graph!!!!!!


Predicting the financial crisis - The Washington Post
This is why I warn against not continuing to promote an idiot's take. From your link:

"In January 2009, economists Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein presented a report that projected unemployment with and without the stimulus plan proposed by President-elect Barack Obama. But they weren't able to predict the severity of the financial crisis, and their estimates were more optimistic than the reality."

In fact, there is more I could add to it. They assumed that any stimulus will have an effect in the month Obama were to take the oath? Seriously, send me some of what you're smoking so I can see the same things you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:29 AM
 
46,276 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Because they are idiots and political correctness is not my style.

You should, especially if you prefer PC. I don't think you can handle being put in place. At least you will get a good sleep more often.
You are very wrong, I like your responses as you are able to back them up without being a total ass hole....but today you are out doing yourself uncle joe....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:29 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,714,837 times
Reputation: 853


From: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:30 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,016,325 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Then PLEASE by ALL MEANS prove them wrong!!!
It's not that the data itself is wrong. It's you're using them in the wrong way, or they're titled in the wrong way.

But I know you know that. Trolls will be trolls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 11:31 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,714,837 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
This is why I warn against not continuing to promote an idiot's take. From your link:

"In January 2009, economists Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein presented a report that projected unemployment with and without the stimulus plan proposed by President-elect Barack Obama. But they weren't able to predict the severity of the financial crisis, and their estimates were more optimistic than the reality."

This is what Obama PROMISED:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top