Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We currently have a government that rules by EO, changes the laws as they see fit and seem to operate in their own little world. They tell us their stories and then backtrack when independent sources tell us otherwise and provide proof.
The major MSM people are the voice of the government. They are not objective reporters; those people are long gone.
The one or two that question are quickly blasted and their stories dismissed.
Given the track record of this administration's constant lies, I'm very skeptical of OUR government right now.
Yes -- but he probably couldn't bring himself to cancel an appearance on Letterman so he could impress his fans with his wit and coolness. How could his fans blame him for what happened in Libya, any more than they could blame other pop stars like the Kardashians.
Yes -- but he probably couldn't bring himself to cancel an appearance on Letterman so he could impress his fans with his wit and coolness. How could his fans blame him for what happened in Libya, any more than they could blame other pop stars like the Kardashians.
Outrageous, isn't it? This twit is more concerned with campaigning than the security and economic well being of America.
This should be headline news. Sadly, the US propaganda units will attempt to bury the information. One now needs to get information about the US in foreign papers, as our media is non-existent. Perhaps they will start to actually ask questions and investigate issues when Romney is in office.
I don't think anyone has called this one verified and legitimate just yet.
Personally, I like to see the real names of sources or other evidence that what is claimed is true before I accept what is claimed is factual.
We'll have to see how this plays out.
Until then, I'm still posting in the hypothetical.
I would hope no one has taken this as fact until verified and then reported based on the actual facts, the links presented use the term "may have" to cover their behinds in-case it is nothing more than rumor.
When I see AP or BBC report it I will believe it has validity. Until them we can only speculate and as we can see there are plenty of posters more than willing to speculate and then add even more accusations and attacks on the President.
I am sure there will more to come, until then everyone can go back to stomping their feet and ranting.
Obama and Hillary have blood on their hands. Won't matter to the sycophants on here though.
Typical, make wild claims, do not provide verifiable sources and facts, and you have the nerve to call others sycophants because they do not auomatically jump on the finger pointing bandwagon.
It's like the Cairo attack and subsequent apologies never happened.
All focus and stories are on Libya and government response to Libya.
The government was too quick to jump on the apology bandwagon when the Cairo attack happened.
And now that is being ignored by both the press and administration..like it never happened.
Typical, make wild claims, do not provide verifiable sources and facts, and you have the nerve to call others sycophants because they do not auomatically jump on the finger pointing bandwagon.
Even if this story did not come out, how can you argue that it is utter incompetence to not have extra security during 9/11? And how do you defend a man who doesn't meet regularly with intelligence officials? he think's he is so smart, he doesn't need to meet with the real experts.
Typical, make wild claims, do not provide verifiable sources and facts, and you have the nerve to call others sycophants because they do not auomatically jump on the finger pointing bandwagon.
They knew. It is looking more obvious. Yet did nothing. What the hell would you call it?
And yes,to excuse these actions makes you a sycophant.
- Obama skips half of his intelligence briefings and doesnt meet often with intelligence experts
- Warning 48 hours in advance and our Administration did NOT issue any alerts
- Obama issues short, weak statement, the day after, does not take questions, and then carries on his campaign day as if nothing even happened
- The attack happened on...9/11. The anniversry of the worst attack on our country, and we did not raise our alert and beef up security
Utter incompetence and stupidity. Yet the press and liberals clearly are eager to look the other way and not demand answers. As one other poster stated, if we re-elect Obama, we deserve as a nation whatever happens, no matter how bad it is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
