Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, it seems like they have to be super smart (Obama, Clinton) or super rich (Bush, Romney).
That said, I don't like the Ivy League requirement. Plenty of other smart people across the country too, but the presidency is a lot about wealth and connections.
Well, it seems like they have to be super smart (Obama, Clinton) or super rich (Bush, Romney).
That said, I don't like the Ivy League requirement. Plenty of other smart people across the country too, but the presidency is a lot about wealth and connections.
Who says Obama is smart?
I like how you broke it down along party lines....so predictable
A much more truthful way of looking at it are the fact that the ones in control of finance in this country are usually Ivy Leaguers and they are the ones who really control this country so they make sure their fellow Ivy Leaguers get in the White House
I like how you broke it down along party lines....so predictable
Well, Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar and Obama graduated Harvard Law magna c*m laude, although Romney did graduate Harvard Law c*m laude - not too shabby.
Well, Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar and Obama graduated Harvard Law magna c*m laude, although Romney did graduate Harvard Law c*m laude - not too shabby.
Wait, you mean Romney got one too? The libs probably think he bought that too as the one guy insinuated.....
Wait, you mean Romney got one too? The libs probably think he bought that too as the one guy insinuated.....
Why do you think they insinuated that - and why did you say they "broke it down along party lines?" The facts are the facts, stop trying to find conspiracy & partisanship (which you are guilty of too, btw) in every response.
Or are you saying Clinton & Obama were dumb/rich, while Bush & Romney were poor? Seriously?
Why do you think they insinuated that - and why did you say they "broke it down along party lines?" The facts are the facts, stop trying to find conspiracy & partisanship (which you are guilty of too, btw) in every response.
Or are you saying Clinton & Obama were dumb/rich, while Bush & Romney were poor? Seriously?
Uh, no I am one of the few non partisans on here sadly..... you on the other hand are extremely partisan
There are no facts here that state that there is not a force behind it ..... the insinuation is that the 2 Dems got there on smarts and the Reps only got there because of money..... quite intellectually dishonest correct?
Would you not agree that those in charge of monetary policy are Ivy leaguers and that it is conveient to make sure that cronies are there in power as well? Makes it easy to manipulate money..... no matter which party has the presidency while the minions are told to bicker over petty social issues
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
