What was Obama's motive for covering up the terror attack? (enemies, 9/11)

[RD5050]

Originally Posted by KUchief25

Uses his head? If he had used his head he never would have funded AQ "rebels" to use as his merc force to take out momar or gave them NATO air support.

You are totally confused. You should stop wasting your time reading "right wing" blogs.

Obama gave the go ahead to provide financial support to the "Free Syrian Army" ... in Syria ... not Libya.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...242140956.html

WASHINGTON—The U.S. has given a Washington-based group clearance to provide direct financial assistance to the Free Syrian Army, a new bid by the Obama administration to support Syria's opposition.

This group was comprised of defectors of the Syrian Army who were protecting the protestors, and keeping them from being killed by Syrian forces.

You can read about it at Wiki: Free Syrian Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[bnepler]

Maybe they were setting up for a victory parade for the Muslim brotherhoodies parade.

[wildflower82]

Libertarian Republican: Sending a gay guy to be an ambassador in a Muslim country, probably not the smartest move, Obama administration

[bnepler]

Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds

Libertarian Republican: Sending a gay guy to be an ambassador in a Muslim country, probably not the smartest move, Obama administration

They were looking for campaign money attendants for Obama.

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by RD5050

Yes ... I have thoughts.

YOU'RE making an ASSUMPTION, and then asking people to respond based on YOUR ASSUMPTION.

Obama DID NOT cover anything up.

Obama waited until he had all the facts before referring to it as a terrorist act.

Obama Considers Libya Assault A ‘Terrorist Attack,’ White House Says - ABC News

You simply don't like that Obama uses his head and keeps his cool during events like this.

Obama knows the world is listening to everything he says, so he doesn't jump to conclusions until he is certain of the facts.

I'm guessing you already forgot about the infamous idiotic presidential statement "Bring Em On" and the damage it caused:

'Bring 'Em On' Fetches Trouble - CBS News

White House says attack in Libya against U.S. was not a planned attack - YouTube

[bluesjuke]

Obama apologists want to avoid the recent history that we were all here for to witness first hand.

We know better, we lived it.

[RD5050]

Originally Posted by Follower Of X

White House says attack in Libya against U.S. was not a planned attack - YouTube

Try watching YOUR OWN video!

Reporter asks a question, and the WH response is ....

"We have no information to suggest that it was a pre-planned attack"

then further into the video, the question is asked again by a reporter, and the WH response was ....

"this is obviously under investigation"

So what does that mean?

It means they DID NOT have all the facts at the time the White House made the statement.

It means the attack was still under investigation.

All they knew at the time was a YouTube video had incited protests against our American Embassy.

Should the White House have made an "incorrect statement" which might then need to be retracted later?

Obama runs a SMART administration that gets all the facts before it speaks.

Unlike your boy MITTENS who speaks first ... then asks questions later!

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by RD5050

Try watching YOUR OWN video!

So what does that mean?

It means they DID NOT have all the facts at the time the White House made the statement.

It means the attack was still under investigation.

All they knew at the time was a YouTube video had incited protests against our American Embassy.

Should the White House have made an "incorrect statement" which might then need to be retracted later?

Obama runs a SMART administration that gets all the facts before it speaks.

Unlike your boy MITTENS who speaks first ... then asks questions later!

"these protests were reaction to a video"

"we have no information to suggest that it was a pre planned attack" with the exceptions of the fact that they were heavily armed and the ambassador said his live was in danger weeks before.

You must work for the White house.

[RD5050]

Originally Posted by Follower Of X

"these protests were reaction to a video"

"we have no information to suggest that it was a pre planned attack" with the exceptions of the fact that they were heavily armed and the ambassador said his live was in danger weeks before.

You must work for the White house.

I can see you are part of the "shoot first" and "ask questions later" mindset.

Can't help you with that one.

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by RD5050

I can see you are part of the "shoot first" and "ask questions later" mindset.

Can't help you with that one.

no, I am for the truth mindset. Half the world new what was going on but the President apparently didnt.

1. Hes a knit wit
2. Hes a liar.

you make the call