Quote:
Originally Posted by ObserverNY
THE TAX SYSTEM EXPLAINED IN BEER
|
I know how you folks are tied to analogies, but let's try for a change an analogy that actually is reflective of how a society works.
We have a tribe of hunter gathers numbering 30 individuals.
There are 15 males and 15 females.
5 of the males are in their prime, 5 are old or infirmed, 5 are children. The females have they same distribution.
Of the 5 males in their prime, 3 are great hunters and warriors, 1 is a lousy hunter and 1 isn't good for much good for anything other than other than making babies. The 5 women do all of the gathering for the tribe.
Due to a drought the women have nothing to gather and the tribe is totally dependent upon the 3 hunters to gather obtain food for the tribe.
On a hunting trip, i hunter kills 10 animals, a second kills 3 and another kills 2 enough to feed the tribe for a week.
Is it your argument that it is unfair for the most successful hunter to contribute more to the tribe than the others?
Should the 5 old and infirmed not be cared for?
The women and children should go without?
And keep on thing in mind, even as great as the greatest hunter is he is defenseless against large predators without the others in the tribe contributing to the mutual defense when necessary?