Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:54 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,713,215 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkGuy View Post
LMAO, you are entitled to your own conspiracies but not to your own unemployment number. I will go with the figures from the BLS.

Yeah you would since they are Obama campaign donors...

BLS economists donate to Obama campaign



Gee...the one guy got his job when Obama was elected and was behind the already debunked ObamaCare financial data reports.

 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,274,359 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
It has moved. Its on the decline.

The U6 figure was 14.2% in Jan 2009. In 2008, the U6 number went from 9.2 to 13.5 in Dec. It topped out at 17.2 in Oct 2009.

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

The trend line for U6 under Obama is more or less the same trajectory as the U3 (7.8%) number, which is declining.
Good, but that's the number, just under 15%. Good for the country then. 15% is still pretty high.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,452,408 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
It has moved. Its on the decline.

The U6 figure was 14.2% in Jan 2009. In 2008, the U6 number went from 9.2 to 13.5 in Dec. It topped out at 17.2 in Oct 2009.

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

The trend line for U6 under Obama is more or less the same trajectory as the U3 (7.8%) number, which is declining.
Yeah....and U6 doesn't include all the dropouts or the young people who have delayed entry into the labor force.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,452,408 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Yeah you would since they are Obama campaign donors...
Except the figure that summers mentioned that NewYorkGuy has a problem with IS FROM THE BLS!!!!!
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,274,359 times
Reputation: 3826
Has anyone bothered to find out why U6 numbers are holding steady while this wonky heuristic is now pegged as .3% lower?
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:59 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,954,062 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Unemployment held steady at just under 15% last I noticed.

That is, unless you're looking at the stats that incorporates job search quitters and McJob holders.
Probably a closer to the truth figure ....... It will be nice to know the ONE will be seeking a new job too pretty soon.

I hear he can get a job in a whinery.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:59 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,713,215 times
Reputation: 853
So you think these people are all conspiracy theorists?:


Jobs Report Met with Skepticism

This morning's jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is being met with skepticism. The report found that, from August to September, the unemployment rate dropped from just above 8 percent to 7.8 percent.


Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former economics adviser to John McCain and the former head the Congressional Budget Office, calls the numbers "implausible."


"Sept. unemployment rate fell to 7.8 percent due to an extraordinary – but implausible – estimate of 873,000 #jobs in household survey,” said Holtz-Eakin

The report presented a slew of contradictory data points, with the total employment level soaring despite the low net number,” said CNBC's Jeff Cox.

The Washington Post's Neil Irwin adds, "Weird that payrolls are exactly on forecast but household survey is far better."


And the Wall Street Journal warns that these numbers should be taken "with a grain of salt."


"The big jump in the household survey is certainly a welcome sign. But take this data with a grain of salt, especially considering the volatile reputation this data point holds,” writes the Wall Street Journal.


"No way in the world these numbers are accurate," said Ed Butowsky of Chapwood Capital Investment on Fox Business. "Somebody needs to do an investigation. ... Investigate these numbers."


Former GE CEO Jack Welch's reaction to non-farm payrolls adding 114,000 new jobs in September and the unemployment rate falling to 7.8 percent:

Twitter/@jack_welch
Looks like Welch already was predicting this last night:
 
Old 10-05-2012, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,452,408 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Has anyone bothered to find out why U6 numbers are holding steady while this wonky heuristic is now pegged as .3% lower?
Because of more people working part time
 
Old 10-05-2012, 02:01 PM
 
1,460 posts, read 2,807,097 times
Reputation: 1105
Honestly, all of you lazy whiners on here who have not gotten jobs yet only have yourselves to blame.

Instead of posting 300+ times a day like some of you, put in some job apps. Stop blaming the government for your failures as a human being and get a job!!! You lazy losers are messing up the economy.

Funny that some of you are even repubs who had moocher yet live on the dole. Hypocrites. You know who you are.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,274,359 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Because of more people working part time
Like I said, Millenials LOVE McJobs!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top