Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2012, 01:19 AM
 
3,117 posts, read 4,586,370 times
Reputation: 2880

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
And just think! He could have started his career in public service in 1966.

To: Mitt Romney
Bloomfield Hills, MI

Greetings: You are hereby ordered for induction into the Armed Forces of the United States.

(It would have been signed by his local draft board. Public service without the bother of having to run for President.)

And the money thing? He could have made a zillion greenbacks and it wouldn't matter to the tax coffers. Romney would have added it to the trust he created for his sons so they wouldn't have to pay tax.

BTW: That means if he becomes President he spends YOUR tax money. But his own sons, who will probably all move into the White House, still won't be paying taxes on all those bucks they get from Daddy's trust fund. Pretty sweet deal. Think you could get that for your family? Or are you the guy working every day and paying your fair share of taxes while Mitt's sons have themselves one sweeeeeet deal?

Whoo-eeee! Public service AND five sons who don't pay taxes on their $100 million trust fund. Mercy! Where do we all sign up to be fat-cat Republicans?

So you're saying a trust fund - comprised of monies already taxed - need to be double taxed? How cavalier you are....with someone else's money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2012, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Murfreesboro (nearer Smyrna), TN
694 posts, read 745,541 times
Reputation: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
You just can't make this stuff up......

Washington Post Runs Op-Ed Asking Why Mitt Romney Isn't Richer, and If He Isn't Richer, Doesn't That Disqualify Him From the Presidency?

Oh dear.

Guess the debate and the ensuing polls are really panicking the liberals, eh?It then tries to dream up reasons why Romney shouldn't be richer. It doesn't credit any of them for being true. But one of the reasons pretty much explains it all -- the private equity market took off, and entered a "Golden Age," the year after Romney left Bain.

That pretty much ends the matter, doesn't it? The first billion is the hardest, and Bain only made its first billion right around the time Romney left. After that, Bain racked up the billions; but the first one was the tough one.


And then Romney left to pursue a career of public service.


But the writer is unconvinced.



Leaving us with two possibilities-- either Romney is lying about his wealth, or Romney is stupid and cannot be our President.
We have had plenty of "stupid" Presidents.

Charles Sands
37129
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 12:52 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,407,829 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
You just can't make this stuff up......

Washington Post Runs Op-Ed Asking Why Mitt Romney Isn't Richer, and If He Isn't Richer, Doesn't That Disqualify Him From the Presidency?

Oh dear.

Guess the debate and the ensuing polls are really panicking the liberals, eh?It then tries to dream up reasons why Romney shouldn't be richer. It doesn't credit any of them for being true. But one of the reasons pretty much explains it all -- the private equity market took off, and entered a "Golden Age," the year after Romney left Bain.

That pretty much ends the matter, doesn't it? The first billion is the hardest, and Bain only made its first billion right around the time Romney left. After that, Bain racked up the billions; but the first one was the tough one.


And then Romney left to pursue a career of public service.


But the writer is unconvinced.



Leaving us with two possibilities-- either Romney is lying about his wealth, or Romney is stupid and cannot be our President.
Okay. Here below is a copy & past of the verbatim quotes from your blog link. I checked them against the blog link, and it's a pretty sizable QUOTE:

__________________________________________________ _

Washington Post Runs Op-Ed Asking Why Mitt Romney Isn't Richer, and If He Isn't Richer, Doesn't That Disqualify Him From the Presidency?

Oh dear.

Guess the debate and the ensuing polls are really panicking the liberals, eh?
Quote:

Mitt Romney is worth $250 million. Why so little?

Mitt Romney is indisputably a very rich man. And if he is elected president on Nov. 6, he will become one of the wealthiest people ever to hold the office.


But exactly how wealthy is Romney? The figure that gets tossed around is $250 million in net worth — meaning the total value of his assets, financial and others, minus any debts.

Mitt Romney's $250 million net worth is much smaller than that of the other big players in the private-equity and leveraged buyout business, as listed in the latest Forbes 400 list of the richest people in America.


Only $250 million? Really?



It’s a big number, but frankly, it seems low. Given the industry in which he made his fortune (private equity), the era when he made it (the 1980s and 1990s) and the wealth of his peers in that business (mostly billionaires), Romney should be worth a good bit more than that.

Why isn’t he?
...
Quote:
Does it really matter if Romney is worth $250 million, $1 billion or more? Rich is rich after all, right? I think it does, politically as well as substantively.
Politically, the alternatives are not great. If he were perceived as the first real billionaire to run for president, it would only exacerbate popular doubts about how someone living so removed from the concerns of average Americans — or even just 47 percent of them — could effectively represent them.
And if he is not a billionaire, doesn’t it suggest that he was not a great private-equity investor after all, thus torpedoing his claim to understand how to create jobs and get the economy back on track?
Something to keep in mind on Nov. 6."


__________________________________________________ __

All of the bolded text has been copied and pasted completely from your blog link. THAT'S FAR MORE THAN A SNIPPET from the blog you linked to. You have another huge copyright violation.

Last edited by FancyFeast5000; 10-09-2012 at 01:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 01:06 AM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,290,404 times
Reputation: 3580
The way Romney acts, I'd expect him to be a billionaire, didn't he suggest that 300,000 is pocket change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top