Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They just want to spread lies and have the world cater to them like they're an important group. They want men ruined, basically.
Yes, that's what i see as well. Feminists seem to want men ruined. I guess Udolipixie is probably right that some just want equality. But it seems like a lot truly do want to ruin men.
Yes, that's what i see as well. Feminists seem to want men ruined. I guess Udolipixie is probably right that some just want equality. But it seems like a lot truly do want to ruin men.
I see lie spreading and wanting to be catered to in your threads and posts as well. Such as the negative generalizations of gals and the fighting and protesting against gals being able to say no and how they should be nice and f*ck guys because they guy wants to.
Some feminists don't want to ruin men and some feminists do want to ruin men. No different than any other group.
Again amusing hypocrisy you've shown bemoaning when you've shown the same and similar behavior.
Last edited by udolipixie; 10-13-2012 at 06:39 PM..
How can someone who wants men and women to be equals also want to ruin men and not women?
Likely through cognitive dissonance.
It seems you're working on the assumption that I'm applying the ruin men to feminists who want men and women to be equals. Some feminists don't want men and women to be equals and I was applying the wanting to ruin men to those feminists. They may not be feminists by your definition or others however by their definition they are feminists.
It seems you're working on the assumption that I'm applying the ruin men to feminists who want men and women to be equals. Some feminists don't want men and women to be equals and I was applying the wanting to ruin men to those feminists. They may not be feminists by your definition or others however by their definition they are feminists.
Hmm, please take a look at this post and explain the bolded to me. Thank you.
Hmm, please take a look at this post and explain the bolded to me. Thank you.
Hmm...I thought it was already explained ala cognitive dissonance and "They may not be feminists by your definition or others however by their definition they are feminists".
Hmm...I thought it was already explained ala cognitive dissonance and "They may not be feminists by your definition or others however by their definition they are feminists".
That isn't "my" definition; it's the definition! And my point is you should call someone on it when they want to be known as a feminist yet... aren't. You're giving hostile people way too much respect by implying "their definition" of a word (in this case, the opposite of the actual definition) should even be considered at all.
If I wanted you to call me God because "by my definition, I'm the one true God" wouldja? Or would you say "Vic, get tha **** outta here!"?
That isn't "my" definition; it's the definition! And my point is you should call someone on it when they want to be known as a feminist yet... aren't. You're giving hostile people way too much respect by implying "their definition" of a word (in this case, the opposite of the actual definition) should even be considered at all.
If I wanted you to call me God because "by my definition, I'm the one true God" wouldja? Or would you say "Vic, get tha **** outta here!"?
I also stated others definition.
I call people on areas that are illegal and harm children/animals such as claiming pedophilia is loving and natural. In my opinion the feminist by their definition is a case of lack of interest not too much respect.
As for the calling you God I'd call you a self-proclaimed God as in my opinion you're claiming something that is non-existent...not interested in hearing religious/spiritual rebuttals.
I call people on areas that are illegal and harm children/animals such as claiming pedophilia is loving and natural. In my opinion the feminist by their definition is a case of lack of interest not too much respect.
As for the calling you God I'd call you a self-proclaimed God as in my opinion you're claiming something that is non-existent...not interested in hearing religious/spiritual rebuttals.
Ah, but with the same logic you follow to give what self-proclaimed "feminists" what they want, you should be willing to call me a god. Because you haven't heard my definition yet Say that in my opinion, a god is a person with my exact name and SS number. How can you deny my existence? *shakes head*
No, if a person is not for the equality of the sexes, they are not a feminist. That they wish to be called one doesn't mean they should be. And this is a huge part of the problem, what inspires threads like this one. Most of the time I see some guy complaining about "them damn feminists!", it's because they don't even know what a feminist is in the first place.
Most people who complain about feminists are feminists, IME.
Ah, but with the same logic you follow to give what self-proclaimed "feminists" what they want, you should be willing to call me a god. Because you haven't heard my definition yet Say that in my opinion, a god is a person with my exact name and SS number. How can you deny my existence? *shakes head*
No, if a person is not for the equality of the sexes, they are not a feminist. That they wish to be called one doesn't mean they should be. And this is a huge part of the problem, what inspires threads like this one. Most of the time I see some guy complaining about "them damn feminists!", it's because they don't even know what a feminist is in the first place.
Most people who complain about feminists are feminists, IME.
I am using the same logic they're a feminist by their definition and you're a god by your definition.
I'm not denying what you think of your existence same as I'm not denying what those feminists think of their existence.
You think you're a god by your definition and they think they're a feminist by their definition.
Seems your issue is with the self-proclaimed bit and that's only tacked on for my perception as the word you're using doesn't exist to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Say that in my opinion, a god is a person with my exact name and SS number. How can you deny my existence? *shakes head*
