Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jake Tapper of ABC asked White House spokesman Jay Carney if President Obama shot first and aimed later when he blamed the Benghazi attacks on a video.
“President Obama shortly after the attack told 60 Minutes that regarding Mitt Romney’s response to the attacks as specifically in Egypt, the president said that Romney has a tendency to shoot first and aim later. Given the fact that so much was made out of the video, that apparently had absolutely nothing to do with the attack in Benghazi, that there wasn’t even a protest outside the Benghazi post. Didn’t President Obama shoot first and aim later?”
Did he ever stop deflecting from the question that was originally asked? Why does obama say Romney shot first and asked questions later, but it is ok for obama to tell the world that it was a movie that not too many had even seen that was to blame? I just don't know how anyone can trust this administration. Hillary might have had a chance before this happened, but it is gone now.
So, Jake is telling us that the Libyan consulate did not call Washington on 9/11, immediately after the attacks started, and did not describe the attacks, as an armed attack?
What preliminary investigation was used by the Obama team which emboldened them to categorically declare, for two weeks, that the Benghazi attack started with a bunch of Muslim protesting??? Furthermore, what rock solid, unflappable intel was provided to state department, that told them that they were protesting a specific movie, or that they were even responding to the riots in Egypt for that matter?
Did he ever stop deflecting from the question that was originally asked? Why does obama say Romney shot first and asked questions later, but it is ok for obama to tell the world that it was a movie that not too many had even seen that was to blame? I just don't know how anyone can trust this administration. Hillary might have had a chance before this happened, but it is gone now.
I wonder how much money Jay gets paid to be the Liar in Chief for the White House. It would have to be a real pile for me to lie like he does. He never started to address Tapper's question in that little bit. I like to watch the poor soul just for laughs and to see what manner he will use to perform his task as Liar in Chief.
I wonder how much money Jay gets paid to be the Liar in Chief for the White House. It would have to be a real pile for me to lie like he does. He never started to address Tapper's question in that little bit. I like to watch the poor soul just for laughs and to see what manner he will use to perform his task as Liar in Chief.
Poor old guy, Jay is not even a good paid liar. You can so see right thru the poor old guy. You can so tell, when he refuses to answer a question and why.
It is funny watching the guy sometimes squirm. You can so tell, when he feels obligated to protect the O' Mighty one.
Poor old guy, Jay is not even a good paid liar. You can so see right thru the poor old guy. You can so tell, when he refuses to answer a question and why.
It is funny watching the guy sometimes squirm. You can so tell, when he feels obligated to protect the O' Mighty one.
I have just been listening to the Liar in Chief for the White HOuse talking about the subject of this thread and Megyn Kelly says she has just put the entire Tapper debate with old Jay on her account on Twitter. I don't tweet but some of you do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.