Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:36 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargobound View Post
With tax season just around the corner it’s time for my blood to start boiling. It seems that every year I here about working poor getting huge refunds via the earned income credit also know as the big screen TV stimulus plan.

Why should anyone get back more than they paid in?

For many low-wage workers, EIC increases work by moving the economic tipping point in favor of work. For many workers with children, low-wage work does not make economic sense without EIC; they would be better off with a welfare bundle of goodies. (For some workers, perverse features of EIC reduce work.)

When it was created in the 1970s, families were usually headed by married couples - not single parents and not cohabiting couples.

Family composition changed in an adverse way and EIC has not changed to keep up with the times; it's time to revisit the whole program.

It is always easier to gain political support for a 'tax' program which gives people money than it is for a spending program which gives people the same amount of money, hence EIC instead of more welfare spending.

For many people, their EIC is maximized by working half-time; this makes absolutely no sense. EIC has a marriage penalty like the marriage penalty for taxes, and promotes cohabitation over marriage. This also makes no sense.

So there is one group of people abusing the heck out of it, and another group of people who are more productive because of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:41 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Pretty much disproves the Republicans hate the poor argument, doesnt it?

Republicans love the poor, as long as they live Somewhere Else and don't ask for housing subsidies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:42 PM
 
4,156 posts, read 4,175,096 times
Reputation: 2076
The tax code need to go. It has to be replaced with a consumption tax. Consumption tax is the only fair tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by yinduffy View Post
It's just a little way of saying "Thank you for voting Democratic!"
Another uneducated post!

Gerald Ford (Nixon's VP and P once Nixon resigned in disgrace) began the EIC in 1975.
It was expanded by Reagan.

You were saying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissNM View Post
I am definitely with you there. And it's not just taxes that set me off. We elected not to have children, because we didn't feel economically stable enough to afford them - so I get a little bent when we realize that we pay for them anyway.

Most places that I have worked offer 4 tiers of medical insurance: single, single with kids, married, and married with kids. Those with 12 kids pay the same rate as a person with one kid - and those of us without kids subsidize it.

I really don't have a problem funding education - but I still feel the need to point out that we pay school district taxes. These taxes are based on property value, and not on the number of kids we have. We own a modest property, so it isn't that high, but we also don't have any kids in school. So that doesn't really seem fair either.
I was economically stable enough to have kids.
I just don't want them.
I don't mind paying for education either, after all, ignorance is much more expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:47 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
The tax code need to go. It has to be replaced with a consumption tax. Consumption tax is the only fair tax.

How is that fair when homeowners get to enjoy tax-free consumption and renters pay up the wazoo?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:57 PM
 
943 posts, read 1,321,142 times
Reputation: 900
The Earned Income Credit was originally a Republican proposal. The idea was to create a tax incentive for low-income people to go to work, rather than to rely on welfare. You can only get EIC if you have earned income.

It's amazing how nowadays people seem to think it's a Democratic idea to reduce the incentive to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdJS View Post
The Earned Income Credit was originally a Republican proposal. The idea was to create a tax incentive for low-income people to go to work, rather than to rely on welfare. You can only get EIC if you have earned income.

It's amazing how nowadays people seem to think it's a Democratic idea to reduce the incentive to work.
Nastly little facts.
Some choose to ignore them.

It's funny because they keep saying that the US has gone far left.
The US has really moved far right, but they refuse to acknowledge it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2012, 04:00 PM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,177,911 times
Reputation: 2375
I would like to see the states take this money from anyone that receives it and is on Medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Republicans love the poor, as long as they live Somewhere Else and don't ask for housing subsidies.
Unless we own the housing complex. Then we don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top