Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2012, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,167,680 times
Reputation: 2283

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargobound View Post
With tax season just around the corner it’s time for my blood to start boiling. It seems that every year I here about working poor getting huge refunds via the earned income credit also know as the big screen TV stimulus plan.

Why should anyone get back more than they paid in?
We don't and it should be discontinued along with welfare, food stamps and section 8.

If people need charity to survive, that's why we have religious institutions and other charities.

I guess "Section 8" and "Welfare" sounds better than "CHARITY", but the reality is, all these programs are institutionalized charity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,600,003 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargobound View Post
With tax season just around the corner it’s time for my blood to start boiling. It seems that every year I here about working poor getting huge refunds via the earned income credit also know as the big screen TV stimulus plan.

Why should anyone get back more than they paid in?
For the children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:09 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,241,253 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by yinduffy View Post
It's just a little way of saying "Thank you for voting Democratic!"

Earned income tax credit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Enacted in 1975, the initially modest EIC has been expanded by tax legislation on a number of occasions, including the widely-publicized Reagan Tax Reform Act of 1986, and was further expanded in 1990, 1993, and 2001, regardless of whether the act in general raised taxes (1990, 1993), lowered taxes (2001), or eliminated other deductions and credits (1986).[6]
1975 in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gerald R. Ford | The White House

Yes, thank you my republican friends! We appreciate you helping out the poor people!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
How is that fair when homeowners get to enjoy tax-free consumption and renters pay up the wazoo?

A bit of an exaggeration. I pay 3.3K a year in property taxes on my home, it would be 4.2K if it was rental property. In some tax years that is deductable, other years I just use the standard deduction.

A renter would probably pay a $100 extra a month to rent my home than he would with equitable property taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,783,759 times
Reputation: 24863
A total redistribution of wealth is indeed taking place now and has become blatant during the last few decades. Wealth is being redistributed from the creators to the owners who are not even willing to support the system making them the wealthiest parasites on the planet. Our entire welfare bill pales in comparison to the interest paid on just credit cards.

We need to drastically revise our Income Tax system. First we should eliminate all of the absurdly complex system with all of its complicated deductions. It should be replaced by a system based on all income from all sources (wages, interest, dividends, rents, inheritance, sales or anything else) with corporations basing their income on retained profits. From that amount a deduction equal to the 90th percentile (currently around 300k) would be subtracted and a flat, or progressive, tax paid on the remainder.

The result of this system would be a major boost in our economy as 90% of our people had a substantial amount of money to save, invest or spend. The banks, stock brokers and manufacturers would see a vast increase in cash flow. The plutocrats that are currently the beneficiaries of our wealth transfer system would indeed see wealth being transferred from them to the system that protects their future wealth. They would not be made poor by any stretch of the imagination but would no longer be guaranteed financial ascendancy by the system. They would actually have to work for their wealth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Pretty much disproves the Republicans hate the poor argument, doesnt it?
No, it simply demonstrates how clueless are republicans when they desperately seek ways to demonize the poor. The very existence of this thread brings out that fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,783,759 times
Reputation: 24863
The greatest fears know to a striving, but not yet securely rich, Republican is falling off the profit cart and becoming poor. That is not only inconvenient but embarrassing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,241,253 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
The greatest fears know to a striving, but not yet securely rich, Republican is falling off the profit cart and becoming poor. That is not only inconvenient but embarrassing.
And the republobots will follow! hoping willard is their ship or ticket to wealth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 08:26 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,911,189 times
Reputation: 1578
Are there any homeowners here that want to complain about the advantages they exploit when tax filing comes around???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 08:31 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,198,807 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
The tax code need to go. It has to be replaced with a consumption tax. Consumption tax is the only fair tax.
I completely agree!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top