Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Which one do you want to hear, willard tells so many.
Think about what you're defending. Obama and his crew Might have admitted that the unknown people who launched rocket-propelled grenades and mortars and killed four Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/12 commited an act of terror. Big whoopdeedoo. What else could it have been. Libyans with very bad aim protecting Americans from non-existent protestors ?
Protestors against the movie spontaneously showed up with their rockets and mortars with the knowledge needed to complete the terror ? So what If he called it an act of terror. He connected it to the movie, not a planned terrorist act by our terrorist enemies, and had his officials do the same.
"• Sept. 21: Clinton says “what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack,” highest official until then to say so."
"• Sept. 25: In his address to the U.N. General Assembly, Obama doesn’t mention terrorism but makes repeated references to the video. Asked about Clinton’s statement on ABC’s“The View” show, the president skirts the issue by saying: “We’re still doing an investigation,” blames “extremist militias.”'
Prior to this, Obama was on Letterman (9/18) and was still blaming the attack on a stupid video. He did the exact same thing at the UN on 9/25.
It took him around two weeks to actually call it a "terrorist attack" and admit it was unrelated to a video.
Why is this being spun? Because we were attacked again on 9/11 by terrorists, on Obama's watch.
Obama even declared, AFTER the Libya attack, that he had put al Qaeda "on its heels".
Less than two weeks after the office of his Director of National Intelligence publicly conceded that people linked to al Qaeda had been involved in the deadly 9/11/12 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, President Barack Obama declared to a crowd in San Francisco that he had put al Qaeda "on its heels."
On Sept. 28, the office of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issued a statement indicating that it had mistakenly believed the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans had happened "spontaneously."
All of this successfully makes Obama look very incompetent and right before an election, too.
Talk about propaganda!
Wrong. It did not take two weeks.
Yet another confirmation.
The empty suit has to have his water carried by the teleprompter again........or I should say the moderator. What a pathetic excuse for CIC he is. Why anyone keeps supporting this guy is beyond me. I guess they enjoy being useful idiots.
Acts of terror will not be tolerated.... "Acts" as in plural.
The following day and for 2 weeks following, it was because of a video. He stated it over and over, in front of the UN.
He knew it was an act of terror, then why change it to it was the video? Unless, as is the rule... Never let a crisis go to waste.
Think about our first amendment and how this administration has tried over and over to restrict our 1st amendment rights of free open speech. Think about how Youtube has exposed the lies of this administration, over and over. This administration has threatened Youtube more than once for material on Youtube. They had Youtube shut down ALIPAC's account on Youtube and all the videos exposing Obama and his amnesty plans were erased from the web.
That exchange with the Moderator correcting(with a lie) Romney, was a set up that had been planned.
Watch it closely. It was not the Moderators job to correct anyone... That was planned well ahead of the debate.
After the debate was over, on CNN Candy Crowley, admitted Romney was right and she mislead the viewers.
Romney may have worded it wrong in the debate, but the Obama administration failed the entire situation. If I was an Obama supporter, I would surely not want to draw any more attention to the Libya issue.
That exchange with the Moderator correcting(with a lie) Romney, was a set up that had been planned.
Watch it closely. It was not the Moderators job to correct anyone... That was planned well ahead of the debate.
After the debate was over, on CNN Candy Crowley, admitted Romney was right and she mislead the viewers.
It is quite obvious it was a set up. This is to be expected by these hacks that call themselves journalists. It's a disgrace. But why should we be shocked? After Dan Rather pulled his BS with his forged documents he was considered a hero by these folks.
It is quite obvious it was a set up. This is to be expected by these hacks that call themselves journalists. It's a disgrace. But why should we be shocked? After Dan Rather pulled his BS with his forged documents he was considered a hero by these folks.
It's a conspiracy!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
