Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2007, 11:32 AM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,197,413 times
Reputation: 3696

Advertisements

In a recent TIME magazine piece, it states that southern Iraq is now basically open country since the British have decided to pull out. The US has always had a light presence since its allies were charged with the oversight of southern Iraq but not it seems that Iran may have more influence in the region.

"Outwardly, the main cities in the south are in the hands of Iraqi authorities answering to the central government in Baghdad. In reality, Karbala, Najaf, Basra and the provinces they sit in are now a struggling ground between the Mahdi Army and the Badr Brigade, a rival Shi'ite militia also though to have links to Iran."

Also recently there was an article in the Gulfnews that Iran has been moderating a peace agreement with Shiite factions in this volatile region. An interesting aspect and some might even cite, as evidence of Iran’s influence is the reopening of some border crossings in the southern Iraq-Iran region.


Also if we look towards northern Iraq we see that it appears that Turkey has begun shelling Kurdish rebel camps along the border. There is even word from Turkey that they are about to engage in paramilitary actions in northern Iraq against the PKK.

"Turkey is shelling suspected Kurdish rebel camps across the border in northern Iraq, a newspaper reported Wednesday, but the government appeared unlikely to move toward sending ground troops until next week.

A large-scale military incursion would disrupt one of the few relatively peaceful areas of Iraq and jeopardize Turkey's ties with the United States, which has urged Ankara not to take unilateral steps.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told reporters that preparations for the parliamentary authorization were under way but he did not say when a motion could reach the floor."



With scant US forces in the south and what appears to be little control in the north, has the United States essentially become the mayors of Baghdad? The current state of Iraq almost mirrors what is taking place in Afghanistan where it is often whispered that the US and UN are frequently referred to as the “Mayors of Kabul”.

In the post invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration has often been criticized for its lack of post invasion planning, Now several years into this misadventure, it seems that the phrase, “lack of planning” is a gross understatement leaving many wondering what hope is there of achieving the goal of a democratic Iraq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2007, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Journey's End
10,203 posts, read 27,126,326 times
Reputation: 3946
Can't really add anything except to agree with you. Now if only we could pool our resources and exchange reading material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 5,001,068 times
Reputation: 604
I hate this ****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
What is the sum of Shiastan + Sunistan + Kurdistan? Zero because these nonexistent states will become Iran + Syria + Turkey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 12:06 PM
 
223 posts, read 604,384 times
Reputation: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
What is the sum of Shiastan + Sunistan + Kurdistan? Zero because these nonexistent states will become Iran + Syria + Turkey.
Good. I say we let them have it, pull the F outta there, tighten our borders for real, start drilling smartly in Alaska and focusing the billions we are spending in that hellhole in the ME on developing clean energy and standardized health care reform (among other issues plaguing our nation.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
stisteved - I agree. Time to let them figure it out for themselves. Besides we only want to keep the oil so we can sell it to China anyway. It is not about oil, it is about oil profits and who gets to keep them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 12:27 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,197,413 times
Reputation: 3696
Of course if it were me, I would suggest you vote for Ron Paul in order to get out of this predicament.

In all seriousness though, it would seem that contrary to various aspects of gain that is purported by surge, the overall seems to be getting even more bleak. Is a three state, loosely federated solution the best course of action? Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey aren't going anywhere and we do at some point have to come home, or at least I hope we do. How much and what can actually be done at this point in order to hold this mess together?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 12:44 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,633,377 times
Reputation: 3028
I've always said I supported Bush removing Saddam. Even Clinton wanted Saddam gone. But I've also never liked how obvious it is that there was not only poor planning, but possibly no planning at all about what would happen with different after effects of Saddam's removal.

Considering that in September that only 3 or 4 benchmarks for the Iraqi govt were slightly close to being met, I'm ready to see us leave. The idea with benchmarks was to set many of them to show clear signs of Iraq's intent to take control back of its country. The benchmarks were not set at difficult to reach levels, and they still were fallen way short of. That was my final straw with voicing support for us to stay and stabilize. While I don't support immediate and full withdrawal, I do support a fast reduction and eventual full removal of troops, within 2 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 01:07 PM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,312,066 times
Reputation: 378
The US is starting to realize a weak central gov't and stronger states based along religious sect lines is the most likely to work becuase the central gov't can't do crap.

(I find it amusing the US congress was criticizing the Iraqi congress for vacationing without doing anything, when the US congress does the same thing)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2007, 01:23 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,197,413 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnbound2day View Post
While I don't support immediate and full withdrawal, I do support a fast reduction and eventual full removal of troops, within 2 years.
I believe it could be done in a year, at least combat troops.
Without a deadline, a perpetually is inevitable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marodi View Post
The US is starting to realize a weak central gov't and stronger states based along religious sect lines is the most likely to work becuase the central gov't can't do crap.

(I find it amusing the US congress was criticizing the Iraqi congress for vacationing without doing anything, when the US congress does the same thing)
Onetheroad posted a clip of Joe Scarborough calling the Iraqi's "dumb" for not managing the chaos we created better. It was one of the most repugnant moments from a US newscaster in the commercial media I have seen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top