Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2012, 09:04 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,305,052 times
Reputation: 30999

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
not a peep from the right wingers.

It's funny to watch the right wing goons throw a complete tantrum about the deficit and spending, yet Willard has proposed to send the nation 2 trillion dollars more into the hole to bankroll the military, when they say they don't need it, and the GOP voters don't seem to care in the slightest.

I guess racking up huge deficits and massive spending are A-OK just as long as the GOP is doing it,..



Romney wants to increase defense spending by $2 trillion. But what will he use it for?
Its not about what Willard will or wont do its all about the Anti Obama vote,
Willard could say once i'm elected i will destroy all life on Earth and he probably wouldnt lose a single vote..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2012, 09:06 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Any liberal talking about Romney causing national debt is a hypocrit.

You people really think you have a RIGHT to talk about the other guy being a danger to the National Debt???????


ARE YOU NUTS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2012, 09:10 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,811,333 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Any liberal talking about Romney causing national debt is a hypocrit.

You people really think you have a RIGHT to talk about the other guy being a danger to the National Debt???????


ARE YOU NUTS?
Do you not understand Willard wants to expand the spending by 7 trillion more than it already is?

Willard is essentially saying he wants to break every spending record he can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2012, 09:10 AM
 
Location: North Central Florida
6,218 posts, read 7,729,420 times
Reputation: 3939
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
You describe them as RW goons, shouldn't the defintion be war mongers? after all, that's what they're best at, starting wars and cutting taxes at the same time. That's the RW agenda you know, turn America into a third world nation.
Do the quick count thru history, and you'll find more wars (and bigger ones, with huge loss of American life) have been started with democrats at the helm. Those wars typically came about because the US was unprepared for war. Keeping a strong defense keeps ones adversaries at bay. HISTORY proves this.

I'm sure that all Americans, rich, middle or poor, all want to pay more taxes. After all that's what we all work for right? Not to better ourselves and our families, and provide the best life for them that we can. The PC crap has really gone too far. There are plenty of deserving folks that truly need the safety net.

The left needs to seriously put down the tax kool aid. You know you dont want to give away any more of your earned money than anyone else does. Problem is most of you dont earn it, when you are perfectly capable of doing so. You want it re distributed to you while you lounge on the front porch, filling out your next application for more food stamps or what ever aid du jour is made available to you by the re distributor in chief.


This proposal to better defend the country, is exactly what the fed gov exists for. Common defence of the nation. Not to wizz away 5 trillion on failed businesses and easy money to their cronies so it can be re "donated" on their next election campaign, and their minnions around the country.


YC.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Any liberal talking about Romney causing national debt is a hypocrit.

You people really think you have a RIGHT to talk about the other guy being a danger to the National Debt???????


ARE YOU NUTS?
Any conservative who votes for Romney and is concerned about the debt is a hypocrites.

Hypocrites abound.

Its why I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Most folks I know that are voting for Obama are scared of losing medicare and social security. Which is silly, because Obama hasn't put a plan to make them solvent either. But most conservatives I know think Romney will be better on the debt, and the economy. I don't undertand either position really, they hold no basis in reality, either way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2012, 04:39 PM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14282
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Willard ain't got no plan, that's the problem.
Please spare us the biased crap already.
More juvenile language, man?

If he doesn't have a plan, you are calling the OP a liar. Do you understand that.


Speaking of plans, where is Barack's. 3 1/2 years as STILL no plan.

After he gets his budget proposals turned by 99-0 he offers nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2012, 04:53 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,872,800 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Because he's White and not "Muslim".
And not a Democrat. Every time there is a Democrat in the White House the GOP goes nuts, doing everything possible to derail their presidency. They seem to feel they have ownership of the office for some reason. Ken Starr and the GOP wasted over $70 million in their crusade to find something on Bill Clinton--$40 million alone on the Lewinski investigation. There is always money to spend when the GOP has its hands on the purse strings. It's only when there is a Democrat in office that they suddenly turn fiscally conservative. Romney would just be a continuation of that tradition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2012, 08:49 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14282
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
And not a Democrat. Every time there is a Democrat in the White House the GOP goes nuts, doing everything possible to derail their presidency. They seem to feel they have ownership of the office for some reason. Ken Starr and the GOP wasted over $70 million in their crusade to find something on Bill Clinton--$40 million alone on the Lewinski investigation. There is always money to spend when the GOP has its hands on the purse strings. It's only when there is a Democrat in office that they suddenly turn fiscally conservative. Romney would just be a continuation of that tradition.
Some people shouldn't comment in posts when they dignore the fact.

Ken Starr worked FOR Janet Reno the dem Attorney General appointed by Bill Clinton.

EVERYTHING Ken Starr did WAS a APPROVRD by her.

Bill Clinton went on national TV and lied to the American people when he said. "I didn't have sexuall realtions....", and many on the left defended him to the nth degree unti thenow famous "blue dress" turned up.

If those on the left want to keep honoring HIM, it shows they have NO honor themselves.

A little info for you, the dems do the sames thing you accuse the repubs of doing. Get real!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2012, 09:05 AM
 
3,378 posts, read 3,707,452 times
Reputation: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
And don't forget his $5T worth of tax cuts. Now we're up to $7 trillion.

ok math genius, you can do simple addition. But, lets look at the bigger picture. Obama has had 4 years as president, and our debt has increased more than any other president ever. What does Obama plan for the next 4 years? more of the same, except... tax the rich! Well, mr. math wizard, is that going to solve our problem? the answer is NO! And, the reason why it won't even help is because our current problem is a SPENDING problem, and not a revenue problem.
Lets say that you (i.e. anyone) meets a bum on the street and he asks for $$ for "food". Do you give it to him? But, what if you find out that the bum spends the money on booze or drugs? Does that change your mind? Obama says yes, we will give you $300/month no questions asked. And, we will tax the evil rich people to pay for it.
This is Obama's economic wisdom.
Newsflash McFly: we don't have enough rich people to offset Obama's spending. Poor people are happy to take the free handouts because that is their best alternative. Obama gives them no viable alternative. The poor (victims) can keep on receiving welfare, and the rich people will continue to be demonized as the greedy unpatriotic citizens, who "should do more".
So, we have millions of people who do nothing but complain, and receive thousands of free handouts.
And, we have the workers: these people are asked to work harder, & longer, and then asked to pay more taxes because millions of unemployed people need it.
Do you not see a problem here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2012, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guamanians View Post
ok math genius, you can do simple addition. But, lets look at the bigger picture. Obama has had 4 years as president, and our debt has increased more than any other president ever. What does Obama plan for the next 4 years? more of the same, except... tax the rich! Well, mr. math wizard, is that going to solve our problem? the answer is NO! And, the reason why it won't even help is because our current problem is a SPENDING problem, and not a revenue problem.
Lets say that you (i.e. anyone) meets a bum on the street and he asks for $$ for "food". Do you give it to him? But, what if you find out that the bum spends the money on booze or drugs? Does that change your mind? Obama says yes, we will give you $300/month no questions asked. And, we will tax the evil rich people to pay for it.
This is Obama's economic wisdom.
Newsflash McFly: we don't have enough rich people to offset Obama's spending. Poor people are happy to take the free handouts because that is their best alternative. Obama gives them no viable alternative. The poor (victims) can keep on receiving welfare, and the rich people will continue to be demonized as the greedy unpatriotic citizens, who "should do more".
So, we have millions of people who do nothing but complain, and receive thousands of free handouts.
And, we have the workers: these people are asked to work harder, & longer, and then asked to pay more taxes because millions of unemployed people need it.
Do you not see a problem here?

Thats the point, McFly.

Obama isn't doing any better, but voting for Romney when he's promising to do worse is just hypocritical, if your main issue is the deficit, you should vote C, other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top