Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mco65 View Post
And CEOs are in favor of a TAX overhaul which is Romneys plan..
They said 'tax increases' and 'raising taxes'. Those are the words they used.

So, tax hikes is now Romney's new plan? I am glad he has finally released his plan, because people have been wondering what he would do if he won. Well, I have been saying all along he is liberal.

Gun-bans, socialized medicine, gay unions, big spending, pro-abortion and now tax-hikes.

How is he not a liberal & socialist?

I am glad I am voting for Ron Paul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2012, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Eastern Colorado
3,887 posts, read 5,747,353 times
Reputation: 5386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They said 'tax increases' and 'raising taxes'. Those are the words they used.

So, tax hikes is now Romney's new plan? I am glad he has finally released his plan, because people have been wondering what he would do if he won. Well, I have been saying all along he is liberal.

Gun-bans, socialized medicine, gay unions, big spending, pro-abortion and now tax-hikes.

How is he not a liberal & socialist?

I am glad I am voting for Ron Paul.
They said they would support tax increases but only if it came with with a high degree of government spending cuts.

Quote:
The executives called the Simpson-Bowles commission approach—about $3 in spending cuts for every $1 of tax increases—an "effective framework" for addressing what they termed "a serious threat to the economic well-being and security of the U.S."
so who is promising to cut government spending? And who criticized whom for ignoring the simpson-Bowles approach?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwiley View Post
They said they would support tax increases but only if it came with with a high degree of government spending cuts.
Right. That's the Dem stance on the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Eastern Colorado
3,887 posts, read 5,747,353 times
Reputation: 5386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Right. That's the Dem stance on the issue.
since when? when has Obama cut anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwiley View Post
since when? when has Obama cut anything?
He has been saying it all along. He calls is "balanced," involving both spending cuts and tax increases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:03 PM
 
3,353 posts, read 6,440,528 times
Reputation: 1128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Who says big business is bad? Why do you think the big business is taking the Dems side on this issue?
The exact thing I was thinking, I'm a democrat and I've never said big business is bad. But any business (more specifically Banks) that are too big to fail without causing a global meltdown are far too large and need to be broken down. As a matter of fact I'd take a shot and say democrats support large business even more than they're republican counterparts for we are typically more of the consumer when compared to republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:05 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
The executives didn't endorse Mr. Obama's proposal to raise the marginal income-tax rates for the top 2% of taxpayers or any other proposal

FAIL!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:06 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
He has been saying it all along. He calls is "balanced," involving both spending cuts and tax increases.
Then why didnt he propose cuts in his budget proposals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,147,086 times
Reputation: 13800
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Chief executives of more than 80 big-name US are banding together to pressure Congress to reduce the federal deficit with tax-revenue increases as well as spending cuts.

CEOs understand that spending cuts alone will either not fix the deficit or be too drastic that it would send us into another recession.

Article:
Blog: CEOs Call for Deficit Action - Fix The Debt

Complete List:
http://www.fixthedebt.org/uploads/fi...p.10-26-12.pdf
LOL Go to the man who has exploded our deficits to over $1 trillion each and every year, and has no plans of slowing down???

the 0bama voters are not even funny anymore, they are disturbingly creepy. 0bama is the biggest crony capitalist our nation has ever seen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMOREBOY View Post
The exact thing I was thinking, I'm a democrat and I've never said big business is bad. But any business (more specifically Banks) that are too big to fail without causing a global meltdown are far too large and need to be broken down. As a matter of fact I'd take a shot and say democrats support large business even more than they're republican counterparts for we are typically more of the consumer when compared to republicans.
"Demorats hate business" is just another lame GOP bumper sticker slogan, and totally untrue.

There have been several proposals which promote the "balanced" approach, but unfortunatelly everything is rejcted by politican opponents these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top