Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-15-2012, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,917,609 times
Reputation: 3497

Advertisements

Pretend for a moment — and I know this is crazy, but stick with me — but just pretend that we want it to be easy for every eligible person to vote, and for the results of elections to reflect as accurately as possible the will of the majority of voters.

Make believe we all agree that lines of up to eight hours to get a ballot like we saw in Florida, Ohio, Virginia and elsewhere last week are unconscionable threats to the right to vote — a veritable poll tax on working people. That it should be hard for an adult citizen not to be registered and almost impossible to vote fraudulently. That it offends the ideals of representative democracy when political parties draw legislative district boundaries for their advantage.

What would we do? What reforms would we institute?

Here are some of the best ideas floating around fantasy election land:

1. Universal registration. “The international norm is an orderly process of automatic registration of every citizen who reaches voting age and of every person who becomes a citizen,” notes FairVote, a project of the Washington- based Center for Voting and Democracy.

Our current, local patchwork and often partisan system of registration leaves us with incomplete and otherwise inaccurate voter rolls. But a system that coordinated with tax, postal, driving, property and other databases to maintain an up-to-date roster of all eligible voters would all but eliminate confusion and the threat of fraud.

2. Minimum ratios of voting machines to registered voters. For all elections involving federal offices — including primaries — it ought to be as quick and easy to vote anywhere in America as it was last week in my Chicago precinct, where I was in and out of the polling place in less than 10 minutes.

In his victory speech last week, President Barack Obama thanked voters who “waited in line for a very long time,” then added, in an apparent ad-lib, “by the way, we have to fix that.” We do. And if assuring efficiency requires federal cash assistance to provide voting machines, trained poll workers and other election resources to areas that are particularly cash-strapped, so be it.

3. Standardized early voting periods. Recent attempts by Republican officials in Ohio and Florida to reduce early-voting opportunities in their states were brazenly partisan and, as it turned out, so outrageous that evidence suggests they ended up increasing the minority turnout they were designed to suppress.

Enough of these infamous games. Enough of early-voting periods ranging from more than 30 days in some states to zero days in other states; of early voting that ends the day before the election in eight states all the way up to seven days before the election in Louisiana.

4. Standardized rules for absentee voting. In some states you need an excuse to vote absentee, in others you can vote absentee, no questions asked. As with early voting, fair elections require equal degrees of enfranchisement for all voters, and that would, of course, include ex-felons.

5. Nonpartisan administration of elections. It’s clearly an invitation to mischief to allow elected officials to set the rules for elections and to oversee disputes that arise pertaining to the vote, such as how to deal with provisional ballots. Reform advocates point to Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board as a model for the nation.

6. Criminalize voter deception. Not in campaign commercials — those will always be deceptive — but in robocalls, mailings and signs that give the wrong day for voting. The Voter Intimidation Prevention Act, which died in the last Congress, made such deceit a federal crime.

7. Establish reliability standards for all voting equipment. We don’t need to have identical voting methods in every city and hamlet in America, but we need identically reliable voting equipment. Research can identify best practices and save us from chads, hanging and otherwise.

8. Rethink this Tuesday thing. If we must do voting on only one day, let it be Saturday, with generous allowances made for those whose faith would keep them from the polls. Or make Election Day a national holiday.

9. Outlaw gerrymandering. I have the feeling that even former President Jimmy Carter, who has monitored elections in 92 countries in democracies supposedly more primitive than ours, cringes when he sees the tortured shapes of the legislative districts drawn by opportunistic Democrats and Republicans. Such lines should be drawn by objective computer programs that do not take previous election results or party identification in mind.

Hey, a man can dream, can’t he?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2012, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,385,739 times
Reputation: 7990
Some of this issue would go away if we just had a limited government as the founders intented. The problem we have now is that there is so much money riding on a vote that there is huge incentive to cheat now.

The other problem I see is that so many people don't know what they are voting for. I know I'm not as well-informed as I should be, but compared to most friends and co-workers I'm a poli sci PhD. Sometimes I think there should be a test before we're allowed to vote. But if we could fix the education system, that problem also would go away.

Of course this is all moot, since neither limited gov't or good education is in the cards anytime soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,917,609 times
Reputation: 3497
Exactly what do you think would go away if we "limited government as the founders intended"? Also, just trying to figure out what the founders intended isn't as straight forward as you seem to think as there were hundreds of them all with different ideas and even the ones who are famous get their writings all twisted up beyond recognition by political actors. Just look at the absolute abortion of lies the tea party people told about Thomas Paine.

Back on topic what do you think of those specific recommendations?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 05:45 PM
 
1,834 posts, read 2,699,340 times
Reputation: 2675
We had no problems voting and no wait and no lines. Those folks that forms in lines in Fla only did that because that is what they wanted to do. They failed to take advantage of other options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top