Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:22 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,415,942 times
Reputation: 31495

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinasgt2005 View Post
That is so melodramatic.Years ago women were not educated on birth control, un-married pregnat were shunned and many times dis-owned, adoption was not really talked about sex education was not yet talked about in schools. Yes, years ago when abortion was Illegal, women were bleeding to death from abortions. That was before education, and society has finally progressed to a point that an un-married pregnant women is not ostrasized. If there were restrictions on abortions which made it impossible for women to use abortion as a means of birth control then women would be turning to adoption as the alternative. I believe we would see a drop in teenage pregnancy and I also believe we would see a drop in STD's. I believe women would take better care with their bodies. IMO
You're fooling yourself if you believe that comment I bolded. If a woman is faced with an unwanted pregnancy and has decided to abort, she will NOT be delivering a baby for adoption. Quite frankly, the fact that there are people who think this is remotely true are just not allowing truth to sink in.

Must history repeat itself, where women fashion their own contraptions to D&C themselves, fling themselves down stairwells, commit suicide, or whatever else they can come up with? All of those things, and then some, happened regularly from the dawn of man right up to when abortion was finally made a legal option - this is not arcane information.

The fact that there are those among us who would have us return to such drastic times is very disheartening. What is worse is the oblivion exhibited by those who would embrace such draconian measures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:25 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,415,942 times
Reputation: 31495
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
So because of one situation you happen to have personal knowledge of you'd force every woman pregnant by rape to carry to term? I think that is at the extreme of being heartless.
Only if your morals aren't identical to hers. You see, when people fail to appreciate or accept that not everyone thinks, feels, and believes exactly what they do (or are even allowed to), they are entirely oblivious to their own selfrighteousness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:35 PM
 
Location: California
236 posts, read 441,975 times
Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
You're fooling yourself if you believe that comment I bolded. If a woman is faced with an unwanted pregnancy and has decided to abort, she will NOT be delivering a baby for adoption. Quite frankly, the fact that there are people who think this is remotely true are just not allowing truth to sink in.

Must history repeat itself, where women fashion their own contraptions to D&C themselves, fling themselves down stairwells, commit suicide, or whatever else they can come up with? All of those things, and then some, happened regularly from the dawn of man right up to when abortion was finally made a legal option - this is not arcane information.

The fact that there are those among us who would have us return to such drastic times is very disheartening. What is worse is the oblivion exhibited by those who would embrace such draconian measures.


Most women HAD abortions because of the stigma of being an un-married pregnant woman. Now an un-married pregnant woman in not uncommon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:39 PM
 
Location: In an illegal immigrant free part of the country.
2,096 posts, read 1,468,029 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Not so, if a woman takes responsibility, uses contraception, and that contraception fails, if the opposers of abortion had their way, you would be forcing her to either walk down that alley or face 9 months of an unwanted pregnancy. Being heartless is not a wonderful thing.


Are these woman unaware that pregnancy may result from sex?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Journey's End
10,203 posts, read 27,112,167 times
Reputation: 3946
These are the key words for me; the difference between the righteous and the self-righteous.

Seems simple, but it sure ain't!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
their own selfrighteousness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:45 PM
 
Location: California
236 posts, read 441,975 times
Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
Only if your morals aren't identical to hers. You see, when people fail to appreciate or accept that not everyone thinks, feels, and believes exactly what they do (or are even allowed to), they are entirely oblivious to their own selfrighteousness.

I don't believe anyone is saying you are not entitled to your belief. Your are pro-choice I am not. I do not judge you for your belief. I do not even judge a woman who has had an abortion, it is after all legal. I will continue believing that abortion is murder and I will continue believing that restrictions need to be put on the abortions. That is my right. I am sure you do not believe in every law that we have in this country. It is your right to fight for a change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:48 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,415,942 times
Reputation: 31495
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinasgt2005 View Post
Most women HAD abortions because of the stigma of being an un-married pregnant woman. Now an un-married pregnant woman in not uncommon.
Oh, forgive me, I was ignorant of the fact that you speak for "most women". Thanks for the enlightenment!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:50 PM
 
Location: California
236 posts, read 441,975 times
Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheroad View Post
These are the key words for me; the difference between the righteous and the self-righteous.

Seems simple, but it sure ain't!

Again, you all are the ones atacking our beliefs. We believe it is murder, we believe there needs to be restrictions. That is our right. We will continue to speak out for reform. That is our right. It is your right to speak out for a woman's choice. It is when you attack someone else belief and start attacking them that it becomes wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Journey's End
10,203 posts, read 27,112,167 times
Reputation: 3946
I don't believe I said you weren't entitled to your beliefs.

I commented on the words, "righteous" and "self-righteous."

When one's belief is foisted on another it is "self-righteous" regardless of the position taken.

Perhaps you read into my comments?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinasgt2005 View Post
Again, you all are the ones atacking our beliefs. We believe it is murder, we believe there needs to be restrictions. That is our right. We will continue to speak out for reform. That is our right. It is your right to speak out for a woman's choice. It is when you attack someone else belief and start attacking them that it becomes wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 12:53 PM
 
Location: California
236 posts, read 441,975 times
Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
Oh, forgive me, I was ignorant of the fact that you speak for "most women". Thanks for the enlightenment!
Are you saying that 30-40 years ago that there wasn't a stigma on un-married pregnant women? That women were being dis-owned or made to go out of state to deliver their babies "So no one would know"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top