Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because your views are hateful by definition and thus you deserve to be called out on it. I don't agree with Nazis on Jews, I don't agree with the KKK on Blacks, and I don't agree with your beliefs on gays.
All are disgusting, vile, and remnants of the stone age.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.
If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.
Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.
The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.
Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
The common and dishonest tactic here is asking a question based on a false premise as if it isn't.
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.
If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.
Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.
The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.
Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
It's just another one of those stupid little code words they learned by watching too much MSNBC.
According to the uber-conservatives around here it's because Saul Alinsky told them to.
(Never mind that the uber-conservatives wouldn't know who Saul Alinsky was if he rose from the dead and organized a protest march in front of their local Piggly Wiggly on Discount For Republicans day.)
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.
If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.
Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.
The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.
Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
Excellent post! IMO, liberals/lefties have no viable arguments for their stances so they have to resort to ad hominum attacks. They use the example of the fringe element on the right to demonize the majority on the right who don't share a lot of their extreme views. It is blantantly dishonest and childish, IMO.
According to the uber-conservatives around here it's because Saul Alinsky told them to.
(Never mind that the uber-conservatives wouldn't know who Saul Alinsky was if he rose from the dead and organized a protest march in front of their local Piggly Wiggly on Discount For Republicans day.)
Why would they need to be able to recognize him in order to know what's in Rules for Radicals?
To answer the OP: because people choose to be irrational, so the technique works.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.