Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2012, 02:57 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,767,786 times
Reputation: 7020

Advertisements

Because your views are hateful by definition and thus you deserve to be called out on it. I don't agree with Nazis on Jews, I don't agree with the KKK on Blacks, and I don't agree with your beliefs on gays.

All are disgusting, vile, and remnants of the stone age.

 
Old 11-06-2012, 02:58 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,767,786 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
Because they can't defend their ideology intellectually.
We're the only ones who defend our ideology intellectually. The OP has been disproved, shot down, and shown to be wrong more times than I can count.

But then you're just as irrational as he is, so it makes sense you side with him.
 
Old 11-06-2012, 02:59 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.

If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.

Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.

The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.

Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
The common and dishonest tactic here is asking a question based on a false premise as if it isn't.
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,594,686 times
Reputation: 7801
Your side do it too, silly!
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,664,841 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.

If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.

Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.

The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.

Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
It's just another one of those stupid little code words they learned by watching too much MSNBC.

Haters.
Racists.
Teabaggers.

And so forth and so forth.
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:20 PM
 
3,963 posts, read 5,693,023 times
Reputation: 3711
So what do the conservatives expect of the liberals if Romney wins?
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:20 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,157,543 times
Reputation: 32579
According to the uber-conservatives around here it's because Saul Alinsky told them to.

(Never mind that the uber-conservatives wouldn't know who Saul Alinsky was if he rose from the dead and organized a protest march in front of their local Piggly Wiggly on Discount For Republicans day.)
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
2,440 posts, read 3,429,912 times
Reputation: 2629
Maybe because they know that if you are a skilled debater with valid points, and truly not a hater, the word should'nt shut you down?
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:23 PM
 
62,872 posts, read 29,103,656 times
Reputation: 18558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
This is a common tactic - and a very dishonest one.

If someone expresses an opinion that a liberal disagrees with - they will invariably post something along the lines that the holder of that opinion "hates" something.

Since hatred is universally held as an ugly and negative emotion - the only motive for the use of this word could be to shut down deate - instead of arguing something based on its merits.

The tactic is dishonest, mean-spirited, patheitc, fallacial, and almost exclusively used by liberals.

Why do liberals seem so afraid to engage in a discussion and instead use hyperbole and mischaracterization to frame the argument?
Excellent post! IMO, liberals/lefties have no viable arguments for their stances so they have to resort to ad hominum attacks. They use the example of the fringe element on the right to demonize the majority on the right who don't share a lot of their extreme views. It is blantantly dishonest and childish, IMO.
 
Old 11-06-2012, 03:26 PM
 
1,512 posts, read 1,821,768 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
According to the uber-conservatives around here it's because Saul Alinsky told them to.

(Never mind that the uber-conservatives wouldn't know who Saul Alinsky was if he rose from the dead and organized a protest march in front of their local Piggly Wiggly on Discount For Republicans day.)
Why would they need to be able to recognize him in order to know what's in Rules for Radicals?

To answer the OP: because people choose to be irrational, so the technique works.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top