Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:09 PM
 
1,978 posts, read 1,553,040 times
Reputation: 2742

Advertisements

Have you heard that old truism, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? Do you not think that if people in high finance and industry, etc. experience increased costs, they will just pass it on the consumers of there product as a price increase? Thus, it is the little guy, the alleged 99 percent person who will get hurt in the end. Now will one of you brilliant liberals tell me where I am making a mistake in my thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Because the 99% don't have any more money and they want their social programs.
Somebody has to pay so it might as well be those left with some money in their pockets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:12 PM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,305,403 times
Reputation: 16665
Because someone making $40K per year shouldn't be paying proportionately more than someone making $40 million. The rich shouldn't be sucking off the sweat of the poor and middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:13 PM
 
1,084 posts, read 2,477,883 times
Reputation: 1273
Isn't there a difference between taxing individuals vs. taxing corporations? How would taxing an individual make a corporation increase the prices of its products?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
I am not for a head tax. Yes, I believe those with more income should pay more than those with lower income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:16 PM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,192,123 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Because someone making $40K per year shouldn't be paying proportionately more than someone making $40 million. The rich shouldn't be sucking off the sweat of the poor and middle class.

Why not? That person making $40 million pays way more taxes---probably more per year than I'll see in my lifetime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,540,621 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by chronic65 View Post
Have you heard that old truism, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? Do you not think that if people in high finance and industry, etc. experience increased costs, they will just pass it on the consumers of there product as a price increase? Thus, it is the little guy, the alleged 99 percent person who will get hurt in the end. Now will one of you brilliant liberals tell me where I am making a mistake in my thinking?
The wealthy should pay more taxes. If a person makes 10 times as much as someone else, they should pay 10 times the taxes....

The problem with our tax system isn't that the rich need to pay more. It's that the bottom 50% pay nothing in federal taxes.

I do agree with your logic though. Regan taught us that trickle down economics works (his policies ushered in the longest boom time we've ever seen). When people who have money spend money demand for goods goes up. When demand for goods go up, jobs are created. When jobs are created, the people who get those jobs pay taxes and have money to spend. When they spend their money, demand for goes goes up....and so on and so on and so on. Too bad obama didn't have the sense to use the debt he racked up to do some trickle down.....a one time stimulus lasts as long as it takes to cash the check. You have to think long term to deal with an economy like this. We need Regan back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,549,515 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by chronic65 View Post
Have you heard that old truism, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? Do you not think that if people in high finance and industry, etc. experience increased costs, they will just pass it on the consumers of there product as a price increase? Thus, it is the little guy, the alleged 99 percent person who will get hurt in the end. Now will one of you brilliant liberals tell me where I am making a mistake in my thinking?
Physics is different than economics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:26 PM
 
3,728 posts, read 4,870,163 times
Reputation: 2294
[sarcasm] Because they are not paying "their fair share". The fact that they can even be called wealthy is evidence that they are holding out. [/sarcasm]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 09:26 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,263 posts, read 52,686,640 times
Reputation: 52775
I don't know all of the deal with taxes, but I think if everyone paid some set percetnage of their income that would make sense.. I think the more wealthy someone gets there seems to be more loopholes and other nonsense.

Flat tax...

You pay X pecent whether you make 25K a yr or 1M a yr... I don't know why we can't get some straight answers on why this wouldn't work...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top