Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The grand strategy of the aging radicals who hijacked the Democratic Party over the past forty years is now apparent:
(1) At the core lie those who can't be motivated and never will; the lawsiuit and lottery-ticket crowd who buy into the myth that new wealth is "stolen" rather than created, and must be redistributed. FDR's crowd taught Great-Grandpa to say "Duuh - Hoover", Grandpa parrotred "Duuuh - Goldwater", and the new class of point-and-grunts is apparently capable of saying "Duuuuh - Bush" -- for as long as they can breathe, eat, and excrete.
(2) Add to that the young and impressionable -- who haven't yet been exposed to the downside of trying to run a business, and usually aren't discreet enough to understand that sexual issues -- straight or gay -- are a private matter, to be nether suppressed or recognized via access to the state's monopoly on power. Count upon the most dogmatic and equally-irrational of social conservatives to be a walking, breathing, unwitting advertisement for the pansexual, metrosexual option.
(3) Count on the unionized educational system to continue to turn out more of the socially-indoctinated and the marginally functional to replace the ranks of aging blind loyalists. Continue to demonize the opposition as either moneyed opressors or religiously-obsessed misfits.
(4) Maintain a sham "business-oriented" clintele in semi-glamorous industries like entertainment and post-industrial service-sector jobs. Most of this "new peasantry" will never advance beyond handling bedpans, order-picking, or the call-center, but they will be expected to remain in the Democratic camp.
That strategy is very similar to the pattern under which the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) dominated Mexican politics for seventy years (1928-2000). Since power nver passed peacefully between the two parties, and independent labor movements were regularly supressed, few academics versed in statecraft regarded it as a "democracy". But I'm sure it would suit Obama, Clinton, Gore and the rest just fine.
Last edited by 2nd trick op; 11-15-2012 at 04:35 PM..
The grand strategy of the aging radicals who hijacked the Democratic Party over the past forty years is now apparent:
(1) At the core lie those who can't be motivated and never will; the lawsiuit and lottery-ticket crowd who buy into the myth that new wealth is "stolen" rather than created, and must be redistributed. FDR's crowd taught Great-Grandpa to say "Duuh - Hoover", Grandpa parrotred "Duuuh - Goldwater", and the new class of point-and-grunts is apparently capable of saying "Duuuuh - Bush" -- for as long as they can breathe, eat, and excrete.
(2) Add to that the young and impressionable -- who haven't yet been exposed to the downside of trying to run a business, and usually aren't discreet enough to understand that sexual issues -- straight or gay -- are a private matter, to be nether suppressed or recognized via access to the state's monopoly on power. Count upon the most dogmatic and equally-irrational of social conservatives to be a walking, breathing, unwitting advertisement for the pansexual, metrosexual option.
(3) Count on the unionized educational system to continue to turn out more of the socially-indoctinated and the marginally functional to replace the ranks of aging blind loyalists. Continue to demonize the opposition as either moneyed opressors or religiously-obsessed misfits.
(4) Maintain a sham "business-oriented" clintele in semi-glamorous industries like entertainment and post-industrial service-sector jobs. Most of this "new peasantry" will never advance beyond handling bedpans, order-picking, or the call-center, but they will be expected to remain in the Democratic camp.
That strategy is very similar to the pattern under which the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) dominated Mexican politics for seventy years (1928-2000). Since power nver passed peacefully between the two parties, and independent labor movements were regularly supressed, few academics versed in statecraft regarded it as a "democracy". But I'm sure it would suit Obama, Clinton, Gore and the rest just fine.
If we repeat your side lost will you progs back out and let us be the winners? Surely you do understand that what you suggest just won't like you of the prog bent think it would.
There was a reason the Founders didn't want either the Senate or the Presidency elected by the people at large, either directly or indirectly via the Electoral Collage. Instead, the State's picked both Senators and members of the Elec. Coll.
That has all been swept aside, and now the trough-sloppers, bottom feeders and hand-outers have procreated into a majority and are now outvoting those who make the country work.
The Trough-Sloppers have re-elected Dumbo the Slow-Learner Obama
Repeate after me:
America Lost
America Lost
America Lost
Stay Tuned and you will soon be convinced, as the American backslide accelerates, that, one more time
If we repeat your side lost will you progs back out and let us be the winners? Surely you do understand that what you suggest just won't like you of the prog bent think it would.
A one-party nation is not a real democracy. Obama is quickly turning this nation into a country like Venezuela or Cuba. Making sure that so many are living off the government will ensure that the candidate who promises the most government handouts will win.
Obama used class division just like the Communists leaders do -- make the have-nots hate passionately those who work and produce and have a little more.
Destroy the productive self-reliant class -- which is the middle class. Communism doesn't grab hold where there is a strong vibrant middle class.
A one-party nation is not a real democracy. Obama is quickly turning this nation into a country like Venezuela or Cuba. Making sure that so many are living off the government will ensure that the candidate who promises the most government handouts will win.
Obama used class division just like the Communists leaders do -- make the have-nots hate passionately those who work and produce and have a little more.
Destroy the productive self-reliant class -- which is the middle class. Communism doesn't grab hold where there is a strong vibrant middle class.
You always say the right things. But what you say is just as important, A one-party Nation, is definitely not a real democray.
You guys acts like children, this is not about winnning or losing, because votes for obama, meant we as a Nation have lost, not one but all?
Businesses are already closing, talked to my realitives in the East tonight, no they did not vote for Obama, people have already lost jobs. When people lose jobs, none of us win, so get off of your high horse.
With the high unemployment figures just coming out, we lose, none of us win.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
