Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-16-2012, 12:48 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,980,650 times
Reputation: 7502

Advertisements

Hmmmmmm....... there ought to be a law......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2012, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,158,856 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Yes, I read the article.

Science tells us that smoking is bad for you. Everyone, with the exception of a few people who are truly delusional, already knows that smoking has many potential consequences for your health. Now that that's been established decisively, science should be working on cures/treatment for cancers caused by smoking and other things, COPD, etc.

We don't need science to tell us that restricting the number of cigarettes someone can have or restricting who can smoke will reduce smoking.

This is about freedom. Weighing 300 pounds is probably worse for you than smoking. Should we have licenses to buy sodas, fast food, sweets, snack items like chips, etc.?
Actually we once didn't know that until after scientific data was created to show the damages of cigarettes. This article is nothing more than a look at ways to help reduce smoking with a pro and counter argument for the idea.

So basically that is plenty of reason for Cons to flip out over nothing, I see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,452,408 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Actually we once didn't know that until after scientific data was created to show the damages of cigarettes. This article is nothing more than a look at ways to help reduce smoking with a pro and counter argument for the idea.

So basically that is plenty of reason for Cons to flip out over nothing, I see.
I'm not flipping out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,158,856 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
I'm not flipping out.
I didn't know I mentioned your name in that statement. Nor do I think this article is something that should be feared, it properly presents both sides of the argument which you and I are on the side of being against a license, but in the article there is no mention of this happening in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 01:02 PM
 
Location: New York metropolitan area
1,316 posts, read 1,585,383 times
Reputation: 341
BAN ALL SMOKING IN PUBLIC !

I hate smelling smoke when walking.... yuck! Second-hand smoke is dangerous
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,150,494 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaimuki View Post
We can't fix stupidity.
Perhaps not, but Black Markets can.

Economically...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 03:29 PM
 
1,970 posts, read 1,760,748 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nunnor View Post
BAN ALL SMOKING IN PUBLIC !

I hate smelling smoke when walking.... yuck! Second-hand smoke is dangerous
Ban progressives. They do more harm than any smoker ever could. LOLOLOLOLOL Such fanatiscsm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 03:31 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,150,612 times
Reputation: 54994
Legalize Pot smoking ..... Ban Cigarette smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,158,856 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by MORebelWoman View Post
Ban progressives. They do more harm than any smoker ever could. LOLOLOLOLOL Such fanatiscsm.
Just keep puffing on your cigarettes, you are just freeing up Social Security for the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2012, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,436,896 times
Reputation: 27720
The government has already decided what type of lightbulbs to buy, what type of toilet to install, what to eat so why not limit the number of cigarettes a person can smoke.

They know better than we do what's good for us..right ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top