Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A 16 year old is most certainly a minor if not a child.
And I don't care if third world countries marry their daughters off at the ripe old age of 10; here in the modern 21st century first world, we don't.
Ironic since your anti-liberal beliefs are quite in line with the 3rd World. Social Conservatism is an archaic relic of the stone age found predominately in the 3rd world, not in the "modern 21st Century world".
All communities with a predominately black population are extremely high in crime and full of thugs. God separated the races for a reason! But people like you ignore the Word of God in favor of worldly acceptance.
She's productive insofar as her ability to reproduce ensuring survival of another generation, this after all is the goal of any species on the planet. Whether her children become productive members of society well that remains to be seen.
You're under the mistaken impression that homosexuality can't contribute to that goal. Science says you're wrong, but you apparently reject science in favor of blind hate.
She's productive insofar as her ability to reproduce ensuring survival of another generation, this after all is the goal of any species on the planet. Whether her children become productive members of society well that remains to be seen.
Sir, we're not just any species. We're humans, and as such, we're supposed to have enough intelligence to control our urge to procreate and ensure that we don't outpace our resources. Resources ARE finite...money being one of them. Someone producing more children than they can afford isn't productive by any definition. They're counterproductive.
Gays not being able to produce a child isn't hurting the United States one bit. Does it hurt Austria? Probably. But that's got nothing to do with us.
He waited 20 years to file a suit for an unspecified amount.
Maybe he just found out this guy has money from the first allegations that got recanted.
Not unspecified any more: he wants 5 MILLION dollars.
I'm calling complete shenanigans on this guy. While I know it's not prudent to make such a bold statement without knowing the facts, I just am not buying this story at all.
If I was ever molested or raped by anyone, regardless of how rich, famous, or powerful they were, I would spend every once of my energy to make sure that person ends up in jail! I would not by holding my hand out for a check and not pursue actions that would allow such a criminal to possibly harm another victim again. This so-called victim isn't trying to get a dangerous pedophile off the streets-he's looking for a major payout!
People like this come out of the wood works to accuse celebs all the time. While I don't feel much sympathy for many celebrities, I can't imagine how much it would suck to be a near constant target for every money grubbing charlatan who can find his or her way to the courthouse. It kills me because in many of these cases, the "relationship" begins after the celebrity is already rich and famous so it really seems like they're being targeted by golddiggers.
One thing that the Sandusky trial has shown us is that pedophiles, no matter how much money or clout they may have, can be prosecuted. The Sandusky victims wanted to see Sandusky behind bars for the rest of his natural life; Clash's accuser just wants $$$$$.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.